User talk:NEMT/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Your most recent vandalism

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to United States Navy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff. Sandstein 20:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I think it's pretty obvious that edit was not vandalism. Additionally, why is a fourth level warning given out of the blue, days after this supposed vandalism took place? I suggest you take more time to review WP:Vandalism before placing templates on anyone else's talk page, it just doesn't seem appropriate for someone such as yourself, an admin, to behave in such a way. --NEMT 20:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I would further add that your next block will be a long one. I know you do make some good edits but I don't like having to check through to find the bad ones. I also don't like your attitude as revealed on your user page. Please don't wiki-lawyer this warning but take it as it is; a last opportunity to change your ways. Good luck. --Guinnog 20:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


Re:Long articles

I'm not quite sure what you're referring to, but you can read more about long articles at Wikipedia:Article size. -- Natalya 13:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


RFC/discussion of article World War II

Hello, NEMT. As a prominent contributor to World War II, you may want to be aware that a request for comments has been filed about it. The RFC can be found by the article's name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:World War II, in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions. -- Krellis 01:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. --NEMT 01:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
No problem, I've tried to put the message out to all of the contributors in the most recent discussions. I'm hopeful that this might get some outside input to help clear up the disagreement. Krellis 01:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

World War II Mediation Case

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/World War II, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. —Krellis (Talk) 21:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the update Krellis. --NEMT 21:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The 300 Spartans

You noted difficulties with the article on this film. We could use your help in trying to clean them up. Thank you. Bbagot 23:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do, I'll have to watch the film again. --NEMT 19:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Italian Civil War

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Italian Civil War, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ian Spackman 15:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

World War VI

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as World War VI) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Charles 23:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

See you in 2101. --NEMT 23:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Union of European Socialist Republics

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Union of European Socialist Republics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MauroVan 12:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Land of the Switzers

What made you create this redirect? Just curious! --Guinnog 18:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

It's helpful for those interested in the English language etymology of the name. --NEMT 20:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Redirects are really meant for terms which a user might type into the box. I'm not sure this one achieves that. No major harm done though, but you might bear that in mind in the future. Best wishes, --Guinnog 20:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Nappy headed hos

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nappy headed hos, by IAMTHEPEOPLESCHAMP, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nappy headed hos fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Inappropriate for a redirect on Wikipedia


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nappy headed hos, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Nappy headed hos itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of McLovin

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on McLovin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because McLovin seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting McLovin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Forza Nuova.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Forza Nuova.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Render unto Caesar..

A tag has been placed on Render unto Caesar.., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

"Superstition"

Hi. I believe your comment on the talkpage for Muhammed referring to "superstition" was uncalled for. I agree that the images should definitely stay, but most of those who have called for the removal of the images have done so in a respectful and polite manner, and to belittle their beliefs in such a way probably only serves to inflame an unfortunate situation.

I know that the constant flow of petitioners can get aggrivating, but please, try to keep your cool =). Lankiveil (talk) 02:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC).

I didn't mean to imply anything disrespectful by it. English is not my first language, but from what I understand, the word applies here. Please note the rest of my comment includes a link to a wiki site similarly indoctrinated readers may find less offensive to their beliefs. --NEMT (talk) 02:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Hawk/Religion in Kazakhstan

A tag has been placed on Religion in Kazakhstan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Am I missing something or is Hawk not really related to Religion in Kazakhstan ? Ubardak (talk) 06:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)