User talk:Neil Larson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Neil Larson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  —Wknight94 (talk) 01:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I created the Market for Corporate Control due to the fact it was a priority request. I had noticed it was previously deleted, so I wasn't sure, but I figured if it needed to be deleted, just delete again, with my apologies. In all likelihood, it stands a good chance of being deleted.

My only intention was to take care of a priority request.N734LQ 23:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You've been blocked

Whoever's sockpuppet you are (and you're clearly not new, or here to do anything productive), I've blocked you indefinitely for attempting to disrupt the RfA process. Majorly (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Administrators, please do not unblock at present. There was checkuser evidence that possibly links User:Android Mouse and User:Neil Larson together. --Deskana (banana) 19:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
As I said on my user talk page, this is also my account. I fail to see a reason why the Neil Larson account was blocked. There was no intent for disruption and no disruption was caused. This block is clearly unjustified. --Android Mouse 20:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Well that figures. Because expressing my opinion is so disruptive. If you infact look at the RfAs, I didn't disrupt at all. I didn't sling personal attacks and assault others' characters as the responders did to me (ex User:L, notice how he doesn't get as much as a warning for his obvious personal attacks). So much for being uncensored. I guess that rule only holds if you don't have any unorthodox viewpoints. Oh and thanks for the nonexistant warning warning beforehand. It's pleasing to know a contributer gets an instant block yet a vandal gets 4 warnings. Not that I've even done anything wrong by expressing my opinion. I guess it's come to the point that we have 'speech crime' here. So much for a free society this website is attempting to build. Suit yourself. Keep whitewashing Wikipedia. Neil Larson"

Decline reason: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. As such, it is in fact censored, it is not a forum for expressing your opinion, and it is not trying to build a free society (only an encyclopedia). Any substantial reasons why you should be unblocked? (A hint: hold the sarcasm.) — Edit conflict: and see Deskana above. — Sandstein 19:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I won't further explain my opinion. It's clear that it isn't wanted. Bye. --Android Mouse 20:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)