User talk:NavodEranda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Please respect editing restrictions

Please respect the editing restrictions that are currently in effect on many SL conflict related articles per the blue box on top of these articles. In particular, you

• violated the 1RR limit here and here
• remove cited material here and here
• added uncited personal opinion here

You really need to respect the edit restrictions, or else you will have to get blocked. That would be a pity. I am aware that you also have done some good faith edits, such as when you added a missing reference here. Please keep doing this good work. — Sebastian 07:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Artile Human Rights in Sri Lanka does not display a warning as saying it's protected or edit restricted. So i dont think i'm violating anything 1RR there.... cheers!! --Navod Ediriweera (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yes, you're right. Sorry about that. — Sebastian 08:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SLR agreement

I hereby have to warn you that we will be adding you to the list of warned editors per this. No more infractions of Wikipedia rules and SLR agreement will be acceptable. Thanks and take care Taprobanus (talk) 21:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

U can say what ever u want, but u cant hide the truth.. and btw.. u dont say what I have done..lol

Hi navod, thanks for takign an interest in bringing some neutrality to these artices. Please let me know if you need any help with editing wikipedia Dutugemunu (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Dutugemunu .. I've been inactive for some time.. i'll be contributing when i can.. --Navod Ediriweera (talk) 10:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Help

There is an article called "Portuguese Ceylon". Sri Lanka was never fully occupied by the Portuguese. For that reason today, it is widely accepted by scholars that the term Portuguese Ceylon is inapplicable. Rather the term Portuguese period in Ceylon (Sri Lanka)‎ is more applicable, because "Portuguese Ceylon" may seem to those who are unaware, as if all of Sri Lanka was occupied by the Portuguese at that time period. Therefore I need someone to help me keep the article title changed.--Svm1 63 (talk) 06:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Svm1. (Just Logged in after some time) I read the article in question and by the look of it all the colonial articles are named that way. It seems to be a wikipedia standard or something.. --Navod Ediriweera (talk) 10:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)