Talk:Naval History (magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] Requested move

Naval History → Naval History (magazine)– The current title could be the target of a mistaken link for naval history in general. Naval history is a common term that should take the common name, and it has roughly 100 links as opposed to the magazine's 20ish. Thus the Naval history article should remain in place, Naval History (with two caps) should be a redirect to Naval history, and the article about the magazine should be Naval History (magazine). The magazine article was originally tagged for a merge, but a move is much more appropriate. - Draeco 02:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

• Support as nom. - Draeco 02:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support Few would think the magazine is the primary topic. Though this begs the question, why don't we have an article on Naval History? 205.157.110.11 03:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support per nom. -- Beardo 07:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Support per nom. --Quuxplusone 20:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)