User talk:Naught101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Coastal architecture? Flood zone architecture?

since this is doubled up, I'll remove it. if you want to check out the discussion go to: Talk:Architecture

[edit] Restored this thread to the Talk:Architecture page, to provide context for the architecture components

I see that you are an inexperienced editor. It is a judgement call whether something is off topic, or informative context. Fortunately, rules are more relaxed on the talk page than on the article page, so we don't need to make that judgement. --Silverback 23:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

no problem. just thought that pollution/consumption wasn't exactly that important to architecture. I thought others might get bored, but if you're happy to make that call, I agree.--Naught101 01:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:30x20px-Australian_aboriginal_flag_icon.png

Ref your new image at Image:30x20px-Australian_aboriginal_flag_icon.png. It is not within the fair use guidelines to use a copyrighted image or design on a template. Regards--A Y Arktos 11:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Since this image is unlikely to be used (the flag article will use the bigger one, of course), it should probably be deleted. Are you happy for me to have it deleted?
You can write a reply on my Talk page. Also, WELCOME to the 'pedia and all that. :) Here are some Australia links you might find useful:
  • WP:AWNB Australian Wikipedians' notice board
  • WP:SYD WikiProject Sydney, editors getting together to collaborate on Sydney-related articles
cheers, pfctdayelise 12:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
hrrmm... should have looked at the history and talk pages huh? sorry people. further reply at Template talk:Australian Flags --naught101 12:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User box TfD

Do you really want another red link on your user page? I don't understand why you're voting delete. WAvegetarian (talk) (email) (contribs) 03:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

I voted delete as I feel that's what's appropriate. I don't particularly care about userboxes, and I don't really think they are all that appropriate to an encyclopedia. And I'd also thank you not to privately lobby people on their user pages, as that's exactly what the problem with userboxes entails. keep it to the Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions. cheers. --naught101 03:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lake Cowal Campaign

Hi - I am proposing that the Lake Cowal Campaign article be merged with Lake Cowal - the campaign would of course redirect there and if the content got too large then it could be broken out again into a separate article. As the creator of the campaign aricle you may wish to comment on the merger at Talk:Lake Cowal. Regards--A Y Arktos 23:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

good idea, replied on Talk:Lake Cowal. --naught101 23:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sustainable tourism

Thank you for addition of the sustainable travel section to Sustainable tourism. It is important for people to know just how their travel affects the environment. I am a big picture person, and not aware the specific facts. If you have any specific details on how tourism affects the environment (or culture or economy), the page could use some additions.

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikify

Hi Naught101. I know that you've been involved in wikifying articles in the past, so I thought I'd draw your attention to this new project. We currently have a backlog of over 6500 articles, so any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated, even if it's only one or two articles! Alternatively, if you know anyone else who might like to help out, please tell them about it. Thanks :) -Ladybirdintheuk 09:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey Ladybird, sorry, but I have very little time. I applaud you efforts, and will help out by wikifying articles that I find that need it when I can, but I can't commit to helping, sorry. good luck --naught101 03:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Farside (band)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Farside (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Farside (band). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 04:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

List of attacks on free speech has also been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] anarchism merge

it seems like the discussion on the merging of anarchy and anarchism is winding to a close over here. wondering if you'd like to audit the results so we can move forward on ths issue. thanks! -- frymaster 19:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] CC

How can you belong to Category:Action on climate change? Suppression of fart? Gabriel Kielland 14:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I try. but that was a mistake, thanks for pointing it out. fixed.--naught101 09:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of TiN Radio

TiN Radio, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that TiN Radio satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiN Radio and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of TiN Radio during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee (Talk) 02:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ArchimedesScreenShot.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ArchimedesScreenShot.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)