Talk:Nautilus Pompilius (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. |
[edit] Nautilus pompilius search
At the moment, putting "nautilus pompilius" into the search field seems to lead to a page on a snail, with no disambiguation. After I have reached this page from a link, putting the same thing in the search field now opens this page, once again with no disambiguation. Not sure how to fix this. Vorravorra (talk) 10:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I fixed it with the template {{redirect}}. See what i did at Chambered Nautilus.
- Thanks for spotting this! --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Expanding the article
...So anyone want to try and expand this article a bit :P I was going to start with a history section. But the question I have is regarding the source. The only good source for this that I know is the (old) official page [1] but it's in Russian. What is the WP policy on that? Should I just translate the bits and pieces from the official history, and then just add it as a source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PolkovnikKGB (talk • contribs)
- A source in Russian is OK, because there are enough people on Wikipedia who can verify it. (Me, for example.)
- A word-for-word translation is a problem, even if it's only parts of the original, because it's a copyright violation. If you write something by yourself, based on that source, then it will be OK. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Article from ruwiki isn't so bad, so why don't you take it to translate? 87.224.249.18 (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
