Talk:Naughty Girl (Beyoncé song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Naughty Girl (Beyoncé song) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | |||
|
||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, an ongoing effort to improve articles related to rhythm and blues, soul music, and their related cultures. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page here. | |
| GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
Contents |
[edit] RfC
Could someone explain why a table needs a column that repeats the same information over and over again, when that information is the name of the article? Can't the reader be expected to realise that chart information in the table concerns the single that the article is about? If there's a variation (and if it should be included), it can easily be included in another column, as I did before my edits were reverted without explanation.
I've placed this (and a couple of similar cases) at RfC in the hope that other editors might bring some common sense to this issue. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
I've also created a discussion page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Tables for charts. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
What's with the bookish presentation... "intimates carnal desires" - it's killin the mojo!
You do like always shine through that this wasn't a big hit, damn it was a big hit indeed, maybe not as her first two singles of the album bit it certainly was a smash hit
[edit] Unsourced
The video pays tribute to Hollywood's Golden Age, as Beyoncé and the cast of the video are dressed in old-fashioned, glamorous clothing and hairstyles. --Efe (talk) 09:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
On "Naughty Girl", over a disco-flavored beat, Beyoncé declares that she's feeling sexy and wants to hear her name spoken by her lover; she then intimates her carnal desires as she offers the suggestion, "Tonight, I'll be your naughty girl". --Efe (talk) 10:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
"Naughty Girl" was also a hit on the Hot Digital Tracks and peaked at number four, while a remix of the song featuring Lil' Flip also managed to chart. "Naughty Girl" was awarded a gold digital single for sales of over 200,000 digital downloads. The commercial release of the single and the digital download also contributed to the single's number-three peak on the Billboard Hot 100. --Efe (talk) 01:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Official versions
Official remixes feature Lil' Flip, Lil' Kim, Grafh, and Redman.
|
|
--Efe (talk) 10:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GA nom on hold
First off, sorry, I know I am divuldging, but, I'm not a fan of your taste in music, but you are so friggen good with these articles! Sorry, I will review in a bit. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 02:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm back. I nearly lit my house on fire!
- "The plan was to push back when "Crazy in Love" was chosen as the first single" Sorry, there is something not right about that sentence. Could you possibly reword it?
- I hide this part. Its unsourced. I still have to verify this content. I was not the one who added this part. --Efe (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Refs 7 and 8 have something wrong with them.
- You mean the bracket? The "UK CD" is actually enclosed in that punctuation per source. However, I don't know what is wrong but the last bracket is not linked. --Efe (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I was honestly expecting to have to review more, but that is all. Again, you rule. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 03:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- I've removed and added content. Please re-check. Thank you very much for reviewing. I'll reply to your talk page for some personal thing. --Efe (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Passed. The reference brackets are kind of wierd but the text of the article is great. Nice work. —Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 21:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've removed and added content. Please re-check. Thank you very much for reviewing. I'll reply to your talk page for some personal thing. --Efe (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
