User talk:Naturalhomes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive |
Contents |
[edit] Proposed merger of Green building and Natural building
Hi Naturalhomes. I see that you've contributed a few times to Green building. How do you feel about the proposed merging of this article with Natural building. Please leave your comment at Talk:Natural building#Proposed merger with Green building. Thanks! --Jrsnbarn 19:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Checking in
Hello again. Too bad about the poll results. i guess I would say that there wasn't enough content there and the list of courses tended to put people off. I still think it is a good site, but accept the consensus. I hope you are not discouraged.
On another matter: I note that you blanked some of the content of your talk page. Normally it is not a good idea to blank pages because they are a record of what happened (even if parts of the history are painful). It might be a good idea to restore it. You can always archive that content at any time. Most who have been around for awhile have archives and they hold all manner of "historical content." Sunray 20:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks I'll figure out how to archive stuff. Thanks too for all your hard work. I think it was more entertaining than discouraging and reading over the various comments and actions of the 'opposers' I feel that there is a bit of a power trip going on. Anyway, I thought about the 'non-encyclopaedic' comment and of course I have to agree. I'll keep working on the site and keep my fingers crossed for the future that someone will find natural homes and re-link it for a new, better reason. Interesting that once their argument was won that there was no more link culling. naturalhomes 19:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Slipform-stone.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Slipform-stone.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 03:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please don't
Your wrote: "Removed links to non-english resources. This is an English encyclopedia" Don't do this again. Non-english sources are valid. `'Míkka>t 18:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, only in certain cases should one use non-English-language sites. In any case, I removed the links in the Sbitenshchik article, since they weren't functional. Sunray (talk) 09:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)