User talk:Nathaniel B. Heraniaos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have given up vandalism."

Decline reason: "It was indefinite for a reason. You had plenty of warning(s), and chose to continue. — Jmlk17 02:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Welcome!

Hello, Nathaniel B. Heraniaos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! VanTucky (talk) 01:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AFD

If you're going to nominate an article for deletion, you need to correctly follow the deletion process by filling out your reasons for nomination on the articles entry and then posting it on the main WP:AFD log. Create the linked entry with the template {{subst:afd2|pg=Conservapedia|cat=|text=}} ~~~~ filling in the text with why you think it should be deleted. Also, just as a side note, users are generally expected to have a strong grasp of Wikipedia policy and guidelines surrounding deletion when nominating articles, so it is usually best to wait a while and make some substantial edits before creating AFDs. VanTucky (talk) 02:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservapedia (fourth nomination). We have to adhere to a neutral point of view. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not violating WP:POINT. I am trying to harm an evil site that should be destroyed. The two are different. Nathaniel B. Heraniaos 02:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
That's the same thing. Wikipedia is not censored, and we adhere to a neutral point of view. So you don't like Conservapedia -- Wikipedia has other pages on stuff I don't like, even some pages that I think should be destroyed. But the pages I want destroyed are notable, so I have no problem with Wikipedia having articles on them. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and please don't attack other users either. The user didn't say that he doesn't hate Conservapedia -- maybe he hates it like you, but he just thinks that it's notable. You're using Wikipedia as a soapbox, which is a frowned upon practice. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
There's nothing wrong with a non-admin closure either. Everybody voted "Speedy keep" or "keep", which is a perfectly acceptable reason for a non-admin to close a deletion discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute an AfD result, see deletion review. Don't edit war over it, which is unacceptable behaviour. WilyD 03:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Report to WP:AIV

These seem to be dormant accounts. Please remove them from AIV, and try WP:AN. Since they are so long dormant perhaps no administrator is going to bother...

No problem in trying to help, but AIV is for current problems. Thanks for your efforts. LessHeard vanU 23:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)