Talk:Natural evil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't agree with this statement of Natural Evil. Good and Evil require intent. A thing cannot be intrinsically Evil for its cause of destruction or havoc. An earthquake bears no malice, nor a personality to harbor evil thought. It's a natural disaster without responsibility, so I suggest that Natural Evil refer to something else, someone closer to, say, natural talent for dark deeds than anything else. 204.215.201.128 03:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)The Lord Massacre

Are you stating your opinion as something by which the rest of us should redefine our vocabulary? Ventifax 22:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Context?

This article makes no explanation of in what context Natural Evil is a term with this accepted meaning. Presumably it is in Philosophy and that at least should be stated. Better still it should be stated who / when first introduced this term, and, if an equivalent concept was discussed earlier under other terms (or with no agreed on term).--Ericjs (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)