From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
| More information about this article... |
|
|
|
The following comments have been left for this page:
I changed the rating of this article since the content is lacking and the mid-level importance is not apparent. -- Flex ( talk|contribs) 03:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC) (edit) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Boston; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. |
|
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on March 14, 2007. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. |
[edit] Notability
I think based on the number of books he's N.DGG 06:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- From the list here, he had five sermons individually published. That's not exactly prolific. Is the list incomplete? In any case, he doesn't appear in the 1911 Britannica [1] or Schaff-Herzog [2]. Has he become notable since their publication? This page does not assert his notability (being the relative of someone who is notable is not enough), and indeed it seems like little more than a genealogical entry. I'm re-adding the prod until the article is improved. --Flex (talk|contribs) 13:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- His importance is likely to be historical rather than theological, and EB is not good for American Clergymen. Actually, it is unclear whether the large number of American 18th century figures entered in WP are N, and what criteria should be used. DGG 01:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, but his historical importance is not noted in the article so far as I can detect. What exactly is his claim-to-fame, as it were, other than being a relatively distant off-spring of some notable and being the father of several putatively non-notables (which is all the article discusses)? (BTW, S-H was edited for an American audience, so I would expect it to take note of him, though of course people can be overlooked or not fully appreciated until later.) --Flex (talk|contribs) 03:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
