Talk:NATO bombing of the Radio Television of Serbia headquarters
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am against the anonymouly proposed merge. This article has got potential and there is plenty of information out there to bring it out its stub status. E Asterion u talking to me? 19:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NATO bombings (disambiguation)
Hi, please tell me guys if this disambiguation (which I've just created) is ok (neutral, etc) thanks.--Emperor Walter Humala · ( talk? · help! ) 04:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
Oppose merge. This start class article already has more information than can be contained in the simple list, and can easily be expanded. --Knulclunk 03:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of victims
This is a conversation that started on my talk page:
Is this event more notable than 9/11? The 9/11 article does not list all of its victims anywhere in the article except for listing the names of those victims who were famous for something else other than just being victims of the attacks as well as providing an external link to the list of those confirmed killed. Granted, almost 3,000 people died in 9/11, but wouldn't it then be in poor taste to say that the NATO bombing list is appropriate simply because it is shorter? There is no assertion of notability for any of the NATO bombing victims outside the lone fact that they died in the event and that, in my mind and according to WP:NOT#MEMORIAL, makes the list somewhat innapropriate for a Wikipedia article. Besides, there is an external link that lists those names. SWik78 (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think the point of WP:NOT#MEMORIALis so you don't put up a page for your dad. The manner of the deaths make the deaths notable, in the way that we list all the victims at Kent State Shootings or Candelária massacre. I wouldn't be opposed to the listing of 9|11 victims, in fact I would be surprised that it hasn't been done. --Knulclunk (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)