National Parliamentary Debate Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

University Parliamentary Debating
World Universities Debating Championship
Regional Championships
Asia · Australasia · Europe · John Smith Memorial Mace · North America
National Championships
Australia · Canada · Ireland
National Organizations
APDA · CUSID · English-Speaking Union · NPDA
Styles
Australasian · British Parliamentary
Lists of debaters
Global · Canadian · New Zealand
Circuits
IONA Debating Circuit
Clubs
Cambridge · Cork · Galway · Glasgow ·
Limerick · Manchester · Maynooth  · Otago ·
Ottawa · Oxford  · Sydney · Tilbury House ·
TCD Hist · TCD Phil · UBC ·
UCD L&H · Victoria · Western Ontario
This box: view • talk • edit

The National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) is one of the two national intercollegiate parliamentary debate organizations in the United States. The other is the American Parliamentary Debating Association (APDA). The NPDA is a relatively young organization, but it is now the largest college debate organization in the United States. Its membership is national, with participating schools on both coasts and throughout the country.

Contents

[edit] The Rules of NPDA Debate

In tournaments sponsored or sanctioned by the NPDA, teams of two persons debate head-to-head. Tournaments issue a new topic each round, generally on issues such as politics, philosophy, and current affairs, and speeches begin after limited preparation time.

Parliamentary debate, which is often shortened as "parli," is a debate format in which tournament officials assign a new topic every round. After the announcement of the topic, the two teams have a limited preparation time (usually 20 minutes) during which to write out their respective cases.

The second important rule is time limits. The standard time limits for an NPDA debate are:

  • First Proposition Speaker: 7 minutes
  • First Opposition Speaker: 8 minutes
  • Second Proposition Speaker: 8 minutes
  • Second Opposition Speaker: 8 minutes
  • Opposition Rebuttal: 4 minutes
  • Proposition Rebuttal: 5 minutes

There are tournaments, however, at which these are modified, generally to a 7-7-7-7-5-5 format. The Claremont Colleges tournament, for instance, uses this 7-5 format. During constructive speeches, debaters may introduce new arguments and the speaker's opponents may rise to ask questions of the speaker. Constructive speakers can accept or reject any given question. Rebuttals are exclusively for summarizing the arguments that were made during constructives.

Over the past few years many coaches and competitors have referred to the official title of speeches with different names. These are unofficial yet very popular with many judges:

  • Prime Minister Constructive
  • Leader of Opposition Constructive
  • Member of Government Constructive
  • Member of Opposition Constructive
  • Leader of Opposition Rebuttal
  • Prime Minister Rebuttal

The third rule of importance is the ban on quoted evidence. Literally, this simply means that the debaters may not bring in printed, published evidence and consult it during the round. It is expected that debaters will use their own preexisting knowledge and research conducted prior to the start of the actual round to back their arguments with reasoning and empirical data.

Once they enter the debating chambers, parliamentary debaters are prohibited from using published materials to supplement their arguments. This places parli in stark contrast to the other common intercollegiate debate format: policy debate. Policy debaters utilize quoted evidence. Though thousands of words have been written about the differences between the two in practice, that is the only meaningful structural difference between them.

Any mature debate circuit will develop its own customs and practices. Some people argue that the NPDA rules are very laissez-faire, preferring to let the norms of what constitutes valid argumentation be subjects for the debate itself. Others believe that, in recent years, the NPDA has been hesitant to allow its participants to engage in controversial, avant garde or "nontraditional" debate practices at its national championship tournament.

[edit] The NPDA Championship Tournament

The NPDA runs one debate tournament each year: the NPDA Championship Tournament, held in late March or early April at rotating host sites. While the inaugural tournament in 1994 only hosted around 40 teams, the 2004 Championship Tournament had over 300 teams in the field from over a half-dozen nations. The tournament also features an exhibition debate between a team of Irish debaters and a team of debaters selected by the NPDA; ironically, the US audience consistently votes for the Irish team.

This tournament's practices are generally modeled by smaller invitational tournaments, which provide the bulk of year-long competition. NPDA sanctions many of these tournaments, and the school that does the best at sanctioned invitationals over the course of the year is awarded a year-long sweepstakes championship.

[edit] Relationship to Other Tournaments and Organizations

There are usually several NPDA-sanctioned invitational tournaments throughout the country to choose from on almost every weekend of the academic year. The largest of these tournaments include the Sunset Cliffs Classic held in February at Point Loma Nazarene University in San Diego, California, the season-opening Top of the Rockies tournament at the University of Wyoming in September, the Al Johnson Invitational at the Colorado College in October, and the Hatfield Debates at Willamette University in February.

[edit] Communicating Between Tournaments

Almost from its inception, the NPDA community has taken advantage of the Internet to continue debates (and to debate about debates) between tournaments and in the off-season. For years, this took place via the official electronic mailing list, much to the chagrin of those who saw that resource as best used for official communication such as posting tournament invitations and results.

Today, much of the online debate (especially between competitors) in the NPDA community takes place via the online forum Net-Benefits.net, founded by University of Southern California then-undergraduate Jed Link. The name "Net-Benefits" is a pun, referring to the debate paradigm by which the debate judge weighs the net benefits of two competing policies. The site is now an electronic hub for discourse and information on parliamentary debate.

[edit] NPDA National Champions

Every year since 1994, the organization has held a national championship tournament. Winning teams include:

[edit] External links