Talk:Nastia Liukin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

This article is within the scope of the Gymnastics WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of gymnastics and related sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non neutral point of view

Under Junior Career, this lines appears: "Nastia Liukin is the best known gymnast in the galaxy. Unfortunately, she takes that for granted." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Euphorya (talk • contribs) 21:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for pulling that out. It was just a drive-by IP posting, from the look of it--not anything any of the editors here would have taken seriously or allowed to remain. DanielEng 22:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)