User talk:Narinen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your edits in all of the previous account incarnations have been intent on reverting to a one-sided view of dating, which also includes other broken things such as broken picture links and references in the wrong place. Removing cited current thought and their cites to revert to the same single opinion view over and over and over and over will be endlessly reverted and get you blocked. You could try discussing on the talk page for inclusion of the one view you appear to greatly wish to have as the only one, but I doubt you will ever find consensus to revert to that one view, even should those theories be proved without a shadow of doubt, the previous ideas would still be there. Please either stop making reverts to "The only version that's right" and start to collaborate and edit towards a greater coverage or desist.--Alf melmac 16:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Great Pyramid of Giza. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. IPSOS (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. IPSOS (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppetry case
 |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Artemisse for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. IPSOS (talk) 17:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
This account has been indefinitely blocked. You have engaged in disruptive edit warring, and are clearly aware of the 3RR having mentioned it in an edit summary. This makes it nearly certain that you are sockpuppet. Even if you are not, given that you know about 3RR, you knew your edit warring was disruptive. --Deskana (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
