Talk:Narmada River

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiproject_Hinduism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not been rated yet on the quality scale.
WikiProject Rivers
This article is part of WikiProject Rivers, a WikiProject to systematically present information on rivers. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article needs a map.

certainly there are advantages and disadvantages to building a dam, and a government would not embark on such a large scale project through only corruption. i need more evidence to substantiate the claims made. hardkorn 01:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC)hardkorn

I have just added photo (from "Geography of India" wiki page) and the link to the aforementioned page. IMO now this page looks a bit more lively. --Volphy 19:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I have removed a part of sentence " led by ....Narendra Modi.." because there is no need to add a political POV here.Bharatveer 09:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC) yoh what is up!!!


I think we should include only geographical and cultural aspects of the river. more over mridul's added section as well as other are lacking in citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.83.145 (talk) 17:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Total revision of the article

This article needs substantial revision in view of lot of developments which have taken place in the basin. Mridul's article needs to be subsumed in the main article since no names of authors are to included in the main article as part of Wikipedia policy. Can I totally change the presenation of this article, but of course suitably incorporating the material which is already presented till date? While in Govt. service, I have been involved for long years with the development of the basin as also the controversy (was in the thick of it in the 90s) which plagued the Saradar Sarovar Project for several years (fortunatley it has been resolved by the Supreme Court judgement now and the project is progressing satisfactorily). As regards including extent of information in the article, it should be be comprehesive as a basin which is an integral part of the river.Ys --Nvvchar (talk) 10:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Revision required

Agree, this article looks more like a someone personal bulletin board —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedar Borhade (talkcontribs) 10:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)