Talk:Nargol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Indian cities workgroup.
This article is maintained by the Gujarat workgroup.
More information about this article...

[edit] Nirmala Srivastava

Why is the fact that she made a trip to a Rajneesh camp pertinent to this article or the fact that the 'Sahasrara of the Virata' was opened there? Without your other source, the relevance of this is unclear. Sfacets 21:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

You seem to be losing your grip, 'Sahasrara of the Virata' being opened there is not an established fact, it is a claim. On the other hand, it is an established fact that Mataji was at the Rajneesh meditation camp - there is photographic and video evidence as well as mention in Coney's book as well as Rajneesh's speeches. Rajneesh's driver maintains that she even drove home from the camp in Rajneesh's car and stopped off for tea with Muktananda - that's how shocked she was! --Simon D M 15:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPA Sfacets 21:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, think for a moment, how can something that happened in the Virata happen in Nargol? Nargol is in the Virata, not the other way round. --Simon D M 15:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Or maybe, having read the article you would notice that it says "the Sahasrara of the Virata [1] was opened for the first time in Nargol". Sfacets 21:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I've corrected the misleading wording, but I really think you need to reflect on your motivations for including anything about your religion in this article. Is it really that relevant for Nargol or is it just spam? ---- Simon D M (talk) 18:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Sahaja Yoga is a notable organisation with its roots in Nargol. Please stick to discussing the article, this isn't the first time you will be warned about WP:NPA personal attacks. SY is not my religion. Sfacets 21:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Which part of WP:NPA applies in this case? I add material from a respected academic, you remove it and call it a 'neutral compromise' ??? --Simon D M (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Please note that "Accusing someone without justification of making personal attacks is also considered a form of personal attack." See WP:NPA --Simon D M (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Feedback

I have written this article (all of it except the first paragraph) and am looking for a few comments. Please give me a few suggestions on how to improve it. -wikigal anahita —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikigal anahita (talk • contribs) 10:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)