Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (long lists)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] List of foo: A

This seems to be the most commonly used format:

-- Reinyday, 03:09, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

I prefer List of foo: A as well. I doubt that this will need to come down to a poll, but with little discussion as of yet one can't tell. -Sean Curtin 21:22, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
If this is the most popular, then I'd say the consensus has already formed on this convention. Hiding talk 08:08, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spanning Lists

While we're at it, we may as well discuss how to do it if the list spans categories:

  • List of foo: A-B
  • List of foo: A - B
  • List of foo: A to B
I would vote for the first. Chuck 15:04, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
I will be using the first option on New Hampshire Historical Markers Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 07:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Support the first. Rich Farmbrough 20:55 25 February 2006 (UTC).
Support first --Donar Reiskoffer 08:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

I was also thinking about a navigational template that would group like the buttons of a telephone:

  • List of foo: A-B-C
  • ...
  • List of foo: W-X-Y-Z

would work much better than the other proposed choices. So count me in for the first. --Francis Schonken 08:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion over "List of mammals in (or of) Foo" articles

A discussion has started at Wikipedia:Village pump (assistance)#List naming dispute: "in" vs. "of" about whether "List of mammals of Foo" or "List of mammals in Foo" is more appropriate. The discussion brings up broader points about how Wikipedia editors should name lists. Interested editors, please comment there. Noroton (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)