Talk:Naked (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High
This article has been rated as High-importance on the priority scale.

[edit] Themes

I gather the movie has no themes, since none are listed?--Syd Henderson 15:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)?-- 15:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


Just curious, What is exactly "mercenary sex in an alley" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.77.157.71 (talk) 02:23, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

I thought the opening scene was a rape scene. The film has two more scenes of apparent rape, one with Johnny and Sophie and another with the landlord & Sophie. What do other people think? Gomez2002 (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it's a rape; money doesn't come into it. I'll make the change BTLizard (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not good

This article is rated as start-class, but whoever granted the rating was being kind. I think it reads more like an overgrown stub. It lacks a decent plot summary, intro, cast section, production section and most glaringly of all, citations; the text is too full of subjective opinion; and in general it is not so much an article full of useful information about this movie, as an article full of the opinions of the people who wrote it. If you want to talk about what this film means to you, review it on Amazon. In the meantime, hard info on the film is not hard to obtain (or, in the case of a plot synopsis, work up oneself from watching the thing). If nobody else steps in, I will do to this article what I did to the one on Life Is Sweet - namely, strip it to its chassis and start all over again.

Thanks, kudos and respect to whoever started the article in the first place, and whoever actually provided information, instead of mere critique. The rest of the article does not reflect very well on the many people who have been tinkering pointlessly with it instead of doing what needed to be done. Lexo (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)