Talk:Nahang Class

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nahang Class article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start	rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
High	rated as High-importance on the assessment scale

Navy Commander of the Iranian Army, Admiral Sajjad Kouchaki: Nahang 1 is the result of the labor of the navy's scientists, scholars, researchers, and experts. It took a long time, but fortunately, we've managed to design this submarine

For gods sakes ... change that ............

[edit] Displacement

Nahang 1 is 500 tons as mentioned in an interview with an admiral (I dont remember who!) but when I found it I will put its link here. Also as we can see on the picture this submarine can not be 75 or 100 tons when compare with Ghadir, Nahang 1 must be heavier than Ghadir.--VatooVatoo 15:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[1]--VatooVatoo 19:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

well...thats maybe true...but i was just saying that some time back iran showed footage of a small submarin that looks identical to Nahang 1 and even in the article's picture you can see that it must be fairly small in comparison to the man on top of it...i could be wrong...but also one should take any countries media with a little suspicion... i have found the picture..here http://www.iribnews.ir/Full_en.asp?news_id=208959&n=33 clearly this is a very small submarine now look at this submarine...http://www.afsouth.nato.int/images/ge206a.jpg the german type 206 which does have have a displacement of 500tons...see how small the men onboard look compared to the pic of the Nahang? Also no where in that video does it even mention the "Nahang-1" submarine....yes it does say they are building subs of up to 500 tons...but he doesnt mention their names...also one could easily question irans military...they also claim to have made a submarine launched missile..yet the video is actually one of a chinese navy missile being tested..Eagle07 22:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, maybe you are right. From that video, he said Iran built 120-500 tons submarine. Iran officially said that Ghadir is 120 tons, hence I think Nahang 1, another Iran built submarine, is 500 tons.--VatooVatoo 06:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

So with that i think we should just leave it at "unknown" for right now until we find stronger evidence towards its displacement. Eagle07 16:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

the diferes com from the fact that the nagang is a 350 to 500 tons submarin (teh diferens coms form the maximun-minimun) displacement an the 206 is a 500 to 700-800(bariations tro models) tons submarine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.250.127.178 (talk) 02:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)