Nahuatl dialects

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nahuatl, Náhuatl, Mexicano, Nawatl
Nahuatlahtolli, Māsēwallahtōlli
Spoken in: Mexico: México (state), Distrito Federal, Puebla, Veracruz, Hidalgo, Guerrero, Morelos, Oaxaca, Michoacán and Durango
Total speakers: over 1.5 million
Language family: Uto-Aztecan
 Aztecan
  General Aztec
   Nahuatl, Náhuatl, Mexicano, Nawatl 
Official status
Official language in: none
Regulated by: Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas
Language codes
ISO 639-1: none
ISO 639-2:
ISO 639-3: variously:
nci – Classical Nahuatl
nhn – Central Nahuatl
nch – Central Huasteca Nahuatl
ncx – Central Puebla Nahuatl
naz – Coatepec Nahuatl
nln – Durango Nahuatl
nhe – Eastern Huasteca Nahuatl
ngu – Guerrero Nahuatl
azz – Highland Puebla Nahuatl
nhq – Huaxcaleca Nahuatl
nhk – Isthmus-Cosoleacaque Nahuatl
nhx – Isthmus-Mecayapan Nahuatl
nhp – Isthmus-Pajapan Nahuatl
ncl – Michoacán Nahuatl
nhm – Morelos Nahuatl
nhy – Northern Oaxaca Nahuatl
ncj – Northern Puebla Nahuatl
nht – Ometepec Nahuatl
nlv – Orizaba Nahuatl
ppl – Pipil language
nhz – Santa María la Alta Nahuatl
nhs – Southeastern Puebla Nahuatl
nhc – Tabasco Nahuatl
nhv – Temascaltepec Nahuatl
nhi – Tenango Nahuatl
nhg – Tetelcingo Nahuatl
nhj – Tlalitzlipa Nahuatl
nuz – Tlamacazapa Nahuatl
nhw – Western Huasteca Nahuatl
xpo – Pochutec

The Uto Aztecan Nahuatl language can be grouped into two rough dialect continua, labelled the central and the peripheral dialects.

The nucleus of the central area is the Valley of Mexico, where the Aztec empire was founded and where it expanded from. Classical Nahuatl, the enormously influential language spoken by the people of Tenochtitlan, the Aztec capital, was one of the central dialects, as are the dialects spoken in that area today. The central dialect area also includes variants spoken in Morelos, Estado de México, Southern Hidalgo, Northwest Puebla, Tlaxcala, and (perhaps) Southeastern Puebla and the Orizaba-Zongolica region of Veracruz. The central dialects are generally considered to have been relatively innovative.

The Peripheral dialects are spoken in areas more distant from the center of the Aztec empire. There is much diversity within the peripheral dialects and various subdivisions among them have been proposed. Peripheral dialects are spoken in Durango, La Huasteca, Guerrero, Tabasco, Veracruz, and the southern Pacific coast as far away as El Salvador.

In her article "Nahuatl dialectology: A survey and some suggestions" (IJAL 54.1. 28-72.) Una Canger summarises research in Nahuatl Dialectology and suggests some diagnostic traits serving to establish central and peripheral dialect continua. Her suggested classification is supported, in general outline, by the enormous dialectological survey conducted by Yolanda Lastra de Suárez, published (1986: UNAM) as "Las Áreas Dialectales del Náhuatl Moderno". Lastra subdivides the Peripheral dialects into an eastern, a western and a La Huasteca area. Her classification stands as the most accepted to this day.

Lastra's detailed classification is as follows:

  • Western periphery
    • West coast
    • Western México State
    • Durango-Nayarit
  • Eastern Periphery
  • Huasteca
  • Center
    • Nuclear sub-area
    • Puebla-Tlaxcala
    • Xochiltepec-Huatlatlauca
    • Southeastern Puebla
    • Central Guerrero
    • Southern Guerrero

All these dialectal areas constitute what may be called General Aztec or Nahuatl proper: it is generally accepted that Pochutec (now extinct) is different enough from all of these to warrant being counted as a sister Nahuan language to General Aztec.

Contents

[edit] Difficulties of classification

The dialectal situation is very complex and most categorizations, including the one presented above, are, in the nature of things, controversial. Lastra herself says, for instance, that "The isoglosses rarely coincide. As a result, one can give greater or lesser importance to a feature and make the [dialectal] division that one judges appropriate/convenient" (1986:189). And after giving the above classification, she immediately makes the caveat: "We insist that this classification is not [entirely] satisfactory" (1986:190).

An early attempt to classify the Nahuan dialects was made by Juan Hasler, on the basis of the variance of the phoneme which in Classical Nahuatl and many other dialects is /tɬ/, in some eastern and southern dialects is /t/, and in a few dialects /l/. He assumed that since the /tɬ/ had been shown by Benjamin Lee Whorf to be derived from proto Uto-Aztecan */ta/ that the group of /t/ dialects were conservative and the /tɬ/ and /l/ dialects more innovative. However, it was later established that at least some t-dialects had also undergone the */ta/>/tɬ/ change and had later changed /tɬ/ back to /t/ in some positions. Hasler's "tetradialectology" is now considered less than fully useful because it is based on this one sole trait, which does not coincide usefully with other isoglosses, and because the crucial assumption which gave that trait extra significance has been contradicted.

Some of the isoglosses used by Canger to establish the Peripheral vs. Central dialectal dichotomy are these:

Central Peripheral
#e- initial vowel e #ye- epenthetic y before initial e
mochi "all" nochi "all"
totoltetl "egg" teksistli "egg"
tesi "to grind" tisi "to grind"
-h/ʔ plural subject suffix -lo plural subject suffix
-tin preferred noun plural -meh preferred noun plural
o- past augment - absence of augment
-nki/-wki "perfect participle forms" -nik/-wik "perfect participle forms"
tliltik "black" yayawik "black"
-ki agentive suffix -ketl/-katl agentive suffix

None of these isoglosses is without its problems, of course. For instance, Tetelcingo Nahuatl, a rather solidly nuclear Central dialect, has ye- and nochi, has neither h nor ʔ nor -lo for marking plurals (but presumably had and lost h), uses (reflexes of) both -meh and -tin, uses the past augment optionally, has both -nki/-wki and -nik/-wik, and uses neither tliltik nor yayawik. On the other three isoglosses, it is solidly Central, however!

[edit] Intelligibility

The differences among the dialects are not trivial, and in many cases result in very low intelligibility: people who speak one dialect cannot understand or be understood by those from another. Thus by many people’s criteria they would be considered different languages. The ISO divisions referenced below respond to intelligibility more than to historical or reconstructional considerations. Like the higher-level groupings, they also are not self-evident, and are subject to considerable controversy.

Nevertheless these variants all are clearly related, and more closely related to each other than to Pochutec, and they and Pochutec are more closely related to each other than to any other Uto-Aztecan languages (such as Cora or Huichol, Tepehuán and Tarahumara, Yaqui/Mayo, etc.)

[edit] List of Nahuatl dialects recognized in ISO 639-3 by number of speakers

(name [ISO subgroup code] – location(s) ~approx. number of speakers)

  • Eastern Huasteca [nhe] – Hidalgo, Western Veracruz, Northern Puebla ~450,000
  • Western Huasteca [nhw] – San Luis Potosí, Western Hidalgo ~450,000
  • Guerrero [ngu] – Guerrero ~200,000
  • Orizaba [nlv] – Central Veracruz ~140,000
  • Southeastern Puebla [nhs] – Southeast Puebla ~135,000
  • Highland Puebla [azz] – Puebla Highlands ~125,000
  • Northern Puebla [ncj] – Northern Puebla ~66,000
  • Central [nhn] – Tlaxcala, Puebla ~50,000
  • Isthmus-Mecayapan [nhx] – Southern Veracruz ~20,000
  • Central Puebla [ncx] – Central Puebla ~18,000
  • Morelos [nhm] – Morelos ~15,000
  • Northern Oaxaca [nhy] – Northwestern Oaxaca, Southeastern Puebla ~10,000
  • Huaxcaleca [nhq] – Puebla ~7,000
  • Isthmus-Pajapan [nhp] – Southern Veracruz ~7,000
  • Isthmus-Cosoleacaque [nhk] – Northwestern Coastal Chiapas, Southern Veracruz ~5,500
  • Tetelcingo [nhg] – Morelos ~3,500
  • Michoacán [ncl] – Michoacán ~3,000
  • Santa María de la Alta [nhz] – Northwest Puebla ~3,000
  • Tenango [nhi] – Northern Puebla ~2,000
  • Tlamacazapa [nuz] – Morelos ~1,500
  • Coatepec [naz] – Southwestern México State, Northwestern Guerrero ~1,500
  • Durango [nln] – Southern Durango ~1,000
  • Ometepec [nht] – Southern Guerrero, Western Oaxaca ~500
  • Temascaltepec [nhv] – Southwestern México State ~300
  • Tlalitzlipa [nhj] – Puebla ~100
  • Pipil [ppl] – El Salvador ~100
  • Tabasco [nhc] – Tabasco

[edit] Nahuatl variants recognized by the Mexican Government

This list is take from the Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas (INALI)'s Catálogo de Lenguas Indígenas Nacionales, published in the Diario Oficial on 14 January 2008,[1] pp.106-129.) The full document has variations on the names especially as “autodenominaciones”, or names the people themselves use for their language. It also has lists (in many cases long lists) of towns where each variant is spoken.

  1. náhuatl de la Sierra, noreste de Puebla
  2. náhuatl del noroeste central
  3. náhuatl del Istmo
  4. mexicano de la Huasteca veracruzana
  5. náhuatl de la Huasteca potosina
  6. náhuatl de Oaxaca
  7. náhuatl de la Sierra negra, sur
  8. náhuatl de la Sierra negra, norte
  9. náhuatl central de Veracruz
  10. náhuatl de la Sierra oeste
  11. náhuatl alto del norte de Puebla
  12. náhuatl del Istmo bajo
  13. náhuatl del centro de Puebla
  14. mexicano bajo de occidente
  15. mexicano del noroeste
  16. mexicano de Guerrero
  17. mexicano de occidente
  18. mexicano central de occidente
  19. mexicano central bajo
  20. mexicano de Temixco
  21. mexicano de Puente de Ixtla
  22. mexicano de Tetela del Volcán
  23. mexicano alto de occidente
  24. mexicano del oriente
  25. mexicano del oriente central
  26. mexicano del centro bajo
  27. mexicano del centro alto
  28. mexicano del centro
  29. mexicano del oriente de Puebla
  30. mexicano de la Huasteca Hidalguense

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] Bibliography

  • BOAS, Franz. 1917. El dialecto mexicano de Pochutla, Oaxaca. IJAL 1. 9-44.
  • CAMPBELL, Lyle. n.d. La dialectología pipil. Ms. : .
  • CANGER, Una and DAKIN, Karen. 1985. An inconspicuous basic split in Nahuatl. IJAL 51. 358-361.
  • CANGER, Una. 1980. Five studies inspired by Nahuatl verbs in -oa. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 19. Copenhagen:
  • CANGER, Una. 1988. Nahuatl dialectology: A survey and some suggestions. IJAL 54.1. 28-72.
  • CANGER, Una. 1988. Subgrupos de los dialectos nahuas. Smoke and Mist: Mesoamerican Studies in Memory of Thelma D. Sullivan. Ed. by J. Kathryn Josserand and Karen Dakin, eds.. 473-498. Oxford: BAR International Series 402. Part ii.
  • DAKIN, Karen and RYESKY, Diana. 1990. Morelos Nahuatl Dialects: Hypotheses on their historical divisions. Morelos en una economia global. Proceedings of the Congress in Cocoyoc, Morelos, November 19023, 1989. Submitted in January, 1990.
  • DAKIN, Karen, and SULLIVAN, Thelma D. 1980. Dialectología del náhuatl de los siglos XVI y XVI. Rutas de intercambio en Mesoamérica y el Norte de Mexico, XVI Round Table, Saltillo, September 9-15, 1979. V. II. 291-297.
  • DAKIN, Karen. 1974. Dialectología nahuatl de Morelos: Un estudio preliminar. Estudios de cultura náhuatl 11. 227-234.
  • HASLER, Juan. 1961. Tetradialectología nahua. A William Cameron Townsend en el Vigesimoquinto Aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. 455-464. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
  • HASLER, Juan. 1975. Los dialectos de la lengua nahua. América Indígena 35. 170-188. : .
  • HASLER, Juan. 1955. Los cuatro dialectos de la lengua nahua. Revista mexicana de estudios antropológicos xiv, 1a parte. 149-152.
  • LASTRA DE SUAREZ, Yolanda. 1979. Nahuatl dialect areas. Presentation to the Friends of Uto-Aztecan Working Conference, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, June 22, Mexico
  • LASTRA DE SUAREZ, Yolanda. 1981. Stress in modern Nahuatl dialects. Nahuatl Studies in Memory of Fernando Horcasitas, Texas Linguistic Forum 18.1. 19-128. Austin: The University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.
  • LASTRA DE SUAREZ, Yolanda. 1986. Las áreas dialectales del náhuatl moderno. Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  • WHORF, Benjamin L. 1937. The origin of Aztec tl. American Anthropologist 39. 265-274.