User talk:Nagle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Archives of this talk page

[edit] Mutual Assistance Living

see Talk:Mutual Assistance Living —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hongsun502 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Horse gait

Years ago you contributed to Horse gait; I have been working on several related pages and would welcome your help. See Talk:Horse gait#Group gaits. Thanks. --Una Smith (talk) 02:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Relation?

Are you related to Derec Marie Alton-Nagle, soldier and horseman, please? - Kittybrewster ☎ 09:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

No. --John Nagle (talk) 18:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation Update

Just to let you all know, the case has been started. I have created a little navbox for you to navigate between pages and will be expanded as the case goes on so that its easier for you to navigate. The first page you need to visit in this case is here so you can give youre opening statement. There i have left a few questions for you all to answer. For those that have been busy and unable to confirm their participation in the mediation, they are welcome to join the mediation at any stage.

I can be contacted in several ways in the event you need to. I am normally present on the wikipedia-en, wikipedia-medcab and wiki-hurricanes IRC channels at some point between 15:00 UTC and as late 02:00 UTC depending on college and real life commitments. To find these channels and instructions on how to access IRC go to WP:IRC. Throughout the day, even when i am in college, feel free to email me using the email tool or by emailing the email address on my user page or both to make sure. You can also leave a message on my talk page which again ill do my upmost to reply to as soon as i can. Seddon69 (talk) 20:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Question on Jewish lobby

John, you left a question there: "Does anyone other than Jayjg (talk · contribs) want to present an argument that this is not a neologism?" - I think you meant to say "that this is a neologism" - right? I would be happy to reiterate some of my earlier arguments (which Shell archived) about it NOT being a neologism. And thank you for working on this while I've been busy: I agree with you that this is the most essential question that must be dealt with in this mediation if we are to make any forward progress on this article. Thanks, Jgui (talk) 06:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Servomotor.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Servomotor.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jewish lobby mediation

I've created a new mediation page so that we can try this again, hopefully with a better result. If you wish to join, please sign here. Jayjg (talk) 01:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Planetstoriesclichecover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Planetstoriesclichecover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. --John Nagle (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New AS mediation

The mediation im getting rolling as its been a long time waiting so i think its best to get moving. Most of the mediation will be on the talk (discussion) page. so make sure its in your watchlist. Seddon69 (talk)

[edit] New Antisemitism Mediation

I think thats its time we got moving. A couple of the points have been raised before and felt they were the foundations to the dispute:

  • Firstly whether the picture can be confirmed to have been taken in the rally in San Fransisco.
  • Secondly to come to an agreement on what new antisemitism is and then to decide what the image is depicting and whether it purely illustrates New Antisemitism or whether it also addresses other issues which could be confused with new antisemitism by new readers.
  • If we cant confirm the those then we need to find a viable alternative.

A point i would like to raise is that at some point a lead image might need to be found if this article got to FA. The image in question is not free and couldn't be put on the main page with this article as todays FA. Although not an immediate point a long term solution might wish to be found so that this article could feature on the main page with a viable alternative.

Does anyone have access to Lexis Nexis? It might help as a search on the network could uncover something not readily available on the internet. Reliable sources that use the image would be helpful. Do you reckon that there would anyway of finding third party images that might possibly contain the poster/placard? Also i would be grateful if images of other placards at that rally could be found to find whether this was a small minority at this rally or perhaps a larger group.

Whilst that is being done i wanted to find out on what the consensus view is on what New Antisemitism is? I have read the article and the previous discussion and attempted to get a proper understanding but i wanted to ensure that this was current.

PS any sources you find can you please post in the section at the top of the mediation talk page. Seddon69 (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Behave

I noticed that you placed {{Behave}} on User talk:Florida babe. That template really needs to be substituted, i.e. {{subst:Behave}}, for it to work properly. You were right about her needing to behave, though. Cheers! —Travistalk 21:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, that's why it doesn't do paragraph breaks properly. It used to work. Probably worth a bug report. --John Nagle (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Fixed the "Behave" template. It had an unclosed DIV tag. It doesn't need to be substituted. --John Nagle (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Allegations of antisem in Jewish Lobby page

John, I read the section you added, which Shell immediately deleted. The question that you are raising (that these are allegations of antisem and not proven antisem) is a good one. I had made that change to the version of the Jl page that Jayjg deleted some months ago (I changed the title of the Antisem section); I have not reinserted any of that material again while mediation proceeds, but it is implicitely one of the changes to be considered since Jayjg requested ALL of my changes to be considered. So the material you added can be re-added if and when we get to a discussion of the changes that Jayjg deleted.

Could I ask you in the meantime to vote on the proposed description of Bard? Either my original version or Carol's modified one are fine with me. If you vote that leaves only Jayjg to respond. Thank you, Jgui (talk) 14:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)