Image:NagHammadi 1.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nag Hammadi Texts

These texts were only discovered in 1945. Thus the photograph cannot be in the public domain due to age. It is actually copyright the Institute of Antiquity and Christianity. (source)

It is public domain due to it's nature of non-original reproduction of a work of expired copyright. Both the codexes and the pages in them were created in circa 400 A.D., stacking them up against a white background and photographing them does not create a new work of art. Nixdorf 20:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid that's not true. In the Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. case, the court ruled that any amount of creative content, including lighting, positioning, and selection of which item to include, make the work copyrightable. None of these apply in scans of 2-D art, but all of these apply here. The photo is definitely copyrighted. Sorry. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 23:07, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
It's definitely not copyrighted in the Netherlands due to Van Dale/Romme. [1] Suaven (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
By the wat, Quadell: without lightning there is not any picture, the positioning is random and the selection is not present: it's a thorough facsimile. I'm afraid you're enslaving us to the law to much, it is definitely not copyrighted. Suaven (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

{{Non-free fair use in|Nag Hammadi|Nag Hammadi library}}

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current00:28, 6 March 2005426×276 (38 KB)Askewmind (Talk | contribs) (Nag Hammadi Texts)

The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):