From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
You have got to be kidding me in respect to the section that raises the question of the motives of the persons who tried to sedate Nadezhda Tylik. This damagages Wikipedia's credibility. The suggestion that the attempt to inject her might have been spurred out of compassion sounds disingenous. It seems rather obvious that the intention was to silence her, not to care for the poor thing. This was probably draconian behavior. I cannot prove this and rather doubt that the opposite ("the compassion argument") could be verified. Even if those doing the injecting were to personally assert that they did so out of the purest of motives, it would not be wise of Wikipedia to reproduce such an assertion, at least not without a statement of skepticism regarding such utterances. In summary: to engage in speculation about motives is not fitting behavior for an encyclopaedic work. I suggest the section speculating as to whether the injectors were kind, nice, fuzzy, altruistic and compassionate persons or government goons be relegated to the trash can. --Sean Maleter (talk) 00:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
