Talk:Naboo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Star Wars, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. To participate, you can improve this article or visit the project page for more information. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and leave a message on the talk page to explain the ratings and to identify possible improvements to the article. | ||
Contents |
[edit] Number of Suns???
Last time I checked, a planet can only orbit around one sun. If it didn't orbit around one sun and belong to one solar system, it wouldn't be a planet anymore...
- You need to check again. Read Planets With Two Suns Likely Common, for starters. PubliusFL 18:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Earth Resemblance
During one shot in Episode II-where a starship approaches Naboo-an examination of coastline of Noth America-from Hudson Bay to Florida-is clearly visible!
[edit] Return of the Jedi
Why whould they be cheering wouldn't they be mad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamhaw (talk • contribs)
- As your question stands, it makes no sense. Please make yourself clearer. --maru (talk) contribs 03:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
He means at the end of the remastered return of the jedi, after the deathstar is destroyed, there is a scene of celebration on Coruscant. Wasn't Coruscant an Imperial world? So shouldn't they be like OH NOES 9/11 IN SPACE? 24.116.11.2 02:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Palpatine is an emperor. It is very likely that the crowd also stood under oppression. - - 'twsx'talk'cont' 22:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Technically, even under the rule of Palpatine, he was oppressing the people of his capitol. So, the people of Coruscant were glad when Palpy was killed and brought down that butt-ugly statue of him. 01kkk
[edit] "Elders"
Could the "Elders" that the Gungans revere have been the Rakata of the Infinite Empire? They are humanoid-ish and have left ruins all over the galaxy, so why not Naboo? Chronolegion 19:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Perspective
This article has some problems with perspective. Per the Wikipedia manual of style, Wikipedia articles on fictional topics should be written from an out-of-universe perspective. So, for example, Naboo has NOT "long been an enigma to astrophysicists," because it is fictional, and fictional planets do not pose problems for scientific theories. PubliusFL 22:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Naboo and Popular monarchy
In the article on popular monarchy, Naboo is given as an example in fiction. Is this true, and if so, what reference can we cite? Note that popular monarchy means that the monarch is designated the ruler of a people, not a territory, thus we'd need somewhere where (for instance) the title 'Queen of the Nabooans' is found. (Being elected does not make it a 'popular monarchy'.) -- Perey 08:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The picture
What happened to the old picture?
This one is terrible, can we get it back?Protoform 11:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LakeRetreat.jpeg
Image:LakeRetreat.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
