Talk:Néstor García Canclini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (major traditions): Continental philosophy

	This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Culture of Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Néstor García Canclini, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Abusing templates

It seems that we need to pay attention to those who can add content, and those who are doing the work that should be done by admins or sysops. The difference is that sysops know, for the most part, how to work with and under consensus. This page is an example of creating pages and pages of nothingness, referring to another page out of the encyclopedia that does exactly the same as Wikipedia is trying to do with respect to biographies only that much better, at this point, it is not funny anymore, it is ironic and sad. Is this a contribution or a disservice to Wikipedia's ideals? Well I guess is debatable as with every single issue.

The issue remains the same, inputting information without conducting a proper research just because you can do it, What is the rush? while doing this you are chasing, and harassing others with some suppose self-acclaimed "super-linguistic skills", only because they are working in the same areas or topics that you pretend to own or control. That is not working together with other wikipedists at all. It is ridiculous, that some people have so much time on their hands, or that enormous amount of disrespect over their shoulders towards other contributors.

I think that this user can contribute a little more by learning to add more content to the pages he/she is creating, because by now, thanks to this user, there are a lot o pages with labels, templates and all sort of things but no real content which is the main focus of this project. I am concern by the quality and verifiable sources supporting all the pages that have been touched by these type of users. Giving the proper distance and time the result of the observation on this behavior has been proven to be a pattern based upon a set of deeply rooted beliefs of the cognitive level of this type of users. Something that many people have and are facing "graciously" as I am writing this report on situ. -"-Todos Llegan de Noche, todos se van de día" 19:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)