Talk:My Dog Skip (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
WikiProject Dogs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.

My Dog Skip (film) is within the scope of WikiProject Mississippi, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Mississippi and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member.
[Watch Project Articles][Project Page][Project Talk][Template Usage]
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:My dog Skip.jpg

Image:My dog Skip.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Error in artice? / Do not watch if you like having unexploded eyeballs.

1. Rant: This movie sucks more than an atomic Hoover. Why do people like Frankie Muniz? He's ugly, annoying and his acting isn't just bad, it's not valid. Frankie Muniz's acting is an optical illusion.

2. Non-rant: are the references to 'moonlighters' and 'moonlight alcohol' erroneous substitutions for the more commonly accepted term for bootleg alcohol, moonshine? And, on the topic, I really suspect that you would need significantly more potent drugs than moonshine to enjoy this movie.

3. Don't even get me started on Kevin Bacon. I swear he has a pork-based name just to make ham jokes too cheap to be worth making. Maybe his birth name was Hugh Nfrom Oak.

thanks for listening,

Captain Schnitz.