Talk:My Coke Rewards

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the My Coke Rewards article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is supported by the Soft Drinks WikiProject, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to all non-alcoholic beverages. Please participate by editing the article, and help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Business and economics Portal

This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.

Start

rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale

Low

rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale

1 controversy section
2 not all codes working
3 iCoke expansion
4 Limitations section
5 Code security section

[edit] controversy section

This section pretty much descends into waffle and personal speculation; I'm considering just deleting the second half of it, but could anyone who knows something about the case in question clean it up? Is the section even worth having; a dismissed frivolous law suit is a bit of a storm in a teacup, rather than a full "controversy" wimbledon andy 13:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Added ^{[citation needed]} to sentence "However, it is important to note that many people drink Coke and are not obese because they take care of themselves and don't blame their personal failures on a soda" Stupidone0 (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] not all codes working

There are many codes that are not working. I have also 12 pack cans codes that are not working. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saudiqbal (talk • contribs)

Okay, what's your point? Termin8er850 22:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Why dont you type it in right instead of B***HING ABOUT IT  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.184.103.203 (talk) 22:00:42, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Why don't we stop making personal attacks and stop using the talk page as an internet forum to post random thoughts. Sabar^Cont 10:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] iCoke expansion

Can the section on iCoke be expanded to include more details, such as limited brands (only on Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, and Coca-Cola Zero) or additional points opportunities (eg. Empire Theatres scratch cards)? --24.78.124.8 (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Limitations section

I fixed some parts of the limitations section, removing parts that were not true (you dont have to drink large quantities rapidy to accrue massive points; just be active once every 90 days), and I also referenced the terms and conditions from the Coke rewards web site. I think we can remove the flag that this section needs references now :) Slyfield (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The limitations section is a little biased. --68.61.167.226 (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Code security section

In this section is a quote of something Justin Hearn said 'privately'. If it was said privately, what's it doing on wikipedia? Is 'privately' just a bad justification for not including a reference? Does anybody know more about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelastic (talk • contribs) 13:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)