User talk:Mwgillenwater

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Mwgillenwater, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Stifle (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Greenhouse Gas Management Institute

   * The exact title of the deleted page

Greenhouse Gas Management Institute

   * The reason why you believe the deletion was not correct

You indicated article does not indicate its importance. Code A7 was listed.

You went on to protect article. 15:03 (Protection log) . . Stifle (Talk | contribs) protected Greenhouse Gas Management Institute (repeated recreation [create=sysop]) +- 15:03 (Deletion log)‎ [Stifle‎ (2×)]

   * Any references or sources to back up your claim, particularly if the deletion reason was A7

I admit that the GHG Management Institute is a relatively new organization. But it is a non-profit, so there is no commercial self-interest in having an article. It is the only global training and educational organization in the world addressing the need for professionals that can ethically and skillfully account for greenhouse gas emissions, which is the basis for the Kyoto Protocol as well as all other policies in the world. The Institute's founding partners include the World Resources Instituet (which has an article in Wikipedia) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (also has an article). The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (has an article) has selected the Institute to train its experts, as has the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol Secretariats, and the World Bank (all three have articles).

Although new, this organization is already recognized as world's the leading training facility for addressing climate change.

Buy Wikipedia's own standards represented by existing articles, I see no reason why this article should have been deleted.

Sincerely, mwgillenwater —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwgillenwater (talk • contribs) 17:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. In future, please sign your messages by typing ~~~~ at the end.
You have not provided any reason why this organization is important or significant (see WP:ORG for some sample criteria), nor any references to reliable sources. If it is truly notable, it will have been written about in some newspapers or magazines, which you should be able to indicate online.
If you can provide such references I will consider undeleting the article. You can alternatively make a listing on deletion review. Stifle (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GHG Management Institute

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please see these discussions

Please see these discussions of your edits:

I encourage you to address folks concerns quickly. Thanks, --A. B. (talk • contribs) 22:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)