Talk:Mustum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, which collaborates on articles related to the Roman Catholic Church. To participate, edit this article or visit the project page for details.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Wine WikiProject Mustum is part of WikiProject Wine, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of wines, grapes, wine producers and wine growing regions. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page where you can join the project and find other ways of helping.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale within WikiProject Wine.
A fact from Mustum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 23 March 2008.
Wikipedia


[edit] Merge idea

(Copied in part from the DYK nom page) I don't think this article needs to be merged because this is a distinct liturgical item with special connotations to the Catholic church. It not just your average, run of the mill grape must. Merging it would be like merging sacramental wine into wine--they're the same but the added religious factor makes the former distinct enough to merit its own article. I'm looking for some better reliable sourcing but I plan on adding to the article the particular stages of "certification" and blessings that the mustum must go through before it is permitted in the Eucharist. AgneCheese/Wine 16:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I completely agree with this - your "wine vs. sacramental wine" example makes it absolutely clear that mustum is, in fact, a separate subject to be discussed than must. For all the same reasons that wine and sacramental wine ought not to be merged, this article ought not to be merged with must, tempting as it is given the similarity of (even just) the names of the two items. Further, thank you for doing some deeper research into the liturgical function of mustum - I will look around myself. Alekjds talk 17:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I just added some material on the liturgical norms - one defines mustum as being, by necessity, unpasteurized. If must can be considered must after pasteurization, then that makes a good case for how the two might be separate - by virtue of the strict liturgical strictures imposed on mustum. It would appear that not just any "must" can be valid "mustum". Alekjds talk 17:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)