User talk:Muramasa itachi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] FAQs with Jéské

There is an FAQ here, and we would appreciate any input or constructive edits you could give on/to it. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 08:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] About your signature

Might I suggest changing your signature in your preferences page so that SineBot won't flag edits you sign as "StardustDragon" as unsigned? If you need help, I can help you. -Jéské (v^_^v X of Swords) 18:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. Testing a fix now. StardustDragon 02:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Looks good. *gives the thumbs-up* -Jéské (v^_^v X of Swords) 02:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ichigo

Discuss at Talk:Ichigo Kurosaki#Ichigo Gonzales (¡Arriba!) or drop it. Edit warring will not succeed. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 03:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Try whatever you like, but you have no source and you never will. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Ooo, checkmate... well hat just settles it then. </sarcasm> Edit war all you like, 3RR will make sure it fails. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Tease all you like, won't change the fact that this tact will fail. There's no proof for your position, so it will be removed. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
You're restoring your old edits, so 3RR applies to you first. Then there's your express intention to edit war. You're admitting intent to be disruptive. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 00:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

 Blocked: two days for edit warring. When you're released from your block, please strive to edit in a less hostile manner and try negotiation before devolving into blindly reverting. I'm particularly unimpressed by your constant baiting and gaming of the three revert rule in edit summaries; please strive not to repeat such behavior in the future. east.718 at 03:06, May 14, 2008

[edit] Again with this

Ain't been a day since you got us both blocked over some stupid shit and you want to start it up again? Your argument is false for a number of reasons. One, Ichigo still had his "pants" (or whatever you want to call that part) on. Two, Kensei himself blew off most of Ichigo's clothing with that knife blast. Three, please don't ignore the obvious. Mask on the face, bone structures on arms, and markings is hollow form. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 21:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

First off, the only reason I let you have your way with the Grimmjow thing is because you exhausted my patience. Regardless, you got your way, so let's forget about it. As for your latest post, just no. Bankai doesn't grow a mask or hollow skin or change someone's feet into bones. You can see Kensei's skin under parts of the armor, so it's growing as Ichigo's did. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 21:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
You and your quick reading skills. I fixed that error a second after posting it. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 21:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Ice is a bit different from bone, but I'm fine with your compromise. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 21:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
That is also wrong. Not only does Ichigo's hollow form have hair, but it grows into a mane. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
it changed, but Ichigo's hair is still intact, just longer. Kensei's lack of hair doesn't mean anything. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)