User talk:Muraad kahn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Muraad kahn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Please also check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh --Ragib 11:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Hamidullah.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Hamidullah.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:IAA5280.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IAA5280.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:IAA5282.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IAA5282.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bangladesh 1971

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Bangladesh 1971, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/b/ba/bangladesh_liberation_war.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Banner home.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner home.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please, don't do this

You have already blanked Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971 once and Bangladesh Liberation War three times. Please, don't do this. I know, you have put a lot of effort into the former article, but the later article is a result of huge discussions and collaborations, and is deemed to be the one to stay. If you have an objection, please, state it on the talk page of Bangladesh Liberation War. If you want to make a constructive contribution, you can do it to that article. It is always highly welcome. But, destructive editing like what you've been doing is considered vandalism, and is not appreciated.

Remember, it is possible to block you and the IP that is doing the same as you are, and it is also possible to protect both the articles from editing by new or anonymous users. Neither is a healthy action, and is used only as a last resort. If you need help understanding Wikipedia editing, you can always ask for help. If you don't know where to ask, just post the request on this page. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia. May your edits grace us for better and for a long time to come. Thanks. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ariel♥Gold 13:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bangladesh Liberation War, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Can someone tell me who removed my contribution, and who ever did I want it back in its original form!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraad kahn (talk • contribs)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Ariel♥Gold 14:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

I would just like to know who took my contributions out and under what judgement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraad kahn (talk • contribs)

[edit] Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971‎

(Repeating notice given to the IP address)

Regarding your edits regarding the redirect of Bangladesh Liberation War into the above page:

Wikipedia is not a collection of duplicate articles with different viewpoints, and making them is considered a POV fork. Please review neutrality and Wikipedia:redirects to explain why there is only one copy. Regarding your opinions of the original article, one of the core policies of Wikipedia is neutrality, which is backed up by verifiability and reliable, third-party sources. If you have issues with the article's view, please discuss your concerns on the article's talk page with the community. Thank you, Ariel♥Gold 14:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Ed (Edgar181) 14:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stop, immediately

Why are you vandalizing the Bangladesh Liberation War article? At least half a dozen editors, all highly experienced, have decided to redirect the article you created. That article stood aganist Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and indiscriminate article creation is never a good idea for anything, not even your own blog. If you really want your article to be on the net you can always do that outside of Wikipedia. There is nothing wrong in it. If you think your article is more important than Wikipedia, then you're wrong. And, if you think it's game that you can keep doing destructive edits and get away with it, you're even more wrong. Your enthusiasm in the subject is highly commendable, all you need is to channel that enthusiasm to positive edits. It's shame to see enthusiastic new editors to be banned. BTW, your edits to the Bangladesh Liberation War article are ruining it. Can't you notice that yet? Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Why have you all decided to vandalise Bangladesh War of Independence 1971 article. I am fully aware of some of the mistakes there, I was in the process of fixing them by the day. Now because your half a dozen, well lets make it a two dozen highly experienced editors, think they know more about a war that I FOUGHT, COMMANDED AND WITNESSED. WELL THEN IF THAT IS THE CASE then I am guilty as charged for doing what I have done, just be decent and WIKI enough to atleast e-mail my contribution that has been blanked and redirected for wiki's personal no good reason at sonnykahn69@hotmail.com. For your information what had happened in Bangladesh 1971 was Bangladesh's INDEPENDENCE WAR and NOT LIBERATION WAR. Bangladesh was not under slavery, that it needed to be freed. And let me ask you under what basis did you all Wikinius's think that Bangladesh War of Independence 1971 article was indiscriminate and destructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraad kahn (talk • contribs)

Muraad, I would again request that you review some of the core policies here on Wikipedia. For one, neutrality. Articles must be written without any opinion or commentary offered by the editor. The fact that you fought in the war, and your responses here, would suggest that you're going to have a very hard time remaining neutral with this issue, as to me, at least, you seem quite passionate about it. Additionally, statements in articles must be verifiable by reliable, third-party sources, which generally mean news articles, reports, etc. While journalists are not always neutral themselves, they do at least have the credibility to support statements given, as one of the core values of journalism is research of fact. When something negative is stated, editors will usually say "as the news agency reported, (statement)" and then cite it with a footnote for reference. As to your concern of the word "liberation" vs. "Independence", let's examine the definitions: Liberation: to free (as a country) from domination by a foreign power. Independent: not dependent: as: not subject to control by others (In this case, Pakistan). Both of those terms are descriptive of what the war involved, Bangladesh's freedom (independence). Review the conversations on the article's talk page, to see why the article was redirected. As to why your edits were not constructive, again, because creating two articles of the same subject, with different viewpoints, is a POV fork and not acceptable. I really would encourage you to step back, take a deep breath, and realize that Wikipedia is a global project, with millions of editors from around the globe, who are working hard to create an encyclopedia of facts, backed by references, written neutrally. Read through the core policies, the guidelines given here, and I hope you'll come to realize the goal is to improve things, which you're more than welcome to do, but I'd suggest that you discuss any controversial edits you make on the talk page, and you need to cite your sources when adding material. I really hope that this helps clear things up for you, Ariel♥Gold 15:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Great Disguise. Regardless, your so called wiki experts have compiled on so called BANGLADESH LIBERATION is nothing more than JUST an article. I should have realised. No wonder journalists, schools, historians and scholars including research groups so much despises and discourages Wiki as a source. I will extend their effort as far as I possibly can. I totally lost my imagination trying to be a part of it. But a commend does warrant on all your sinuous, labyrinth of bias (THIS IS ONLY PRETAINING TO YOUR ARTICLE ON BANGLADESH LIBERATION). I officially apologise for all the trouble and pain that I may have caused you. I promise that I will steer clear from unWikifying and undermining your expert work. By all means march on. And further, may be this is a little unwikifying but would you be kind enough to delete or close out my account or place me on permanent blockage however you do it. If I need to myself just fill me in please. Thank you.

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Banner home.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner home.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Banner short.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner short.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Memorial3.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Memorial3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)