Talk:Murder of Victoria Climbié

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Murder of Victoria Climbié has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 17, 2007 Good article nominee Listed October 9, 2007 Good article reassessment Kept March 6, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted Current Status: Good article

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	This article is part of a WikiProject to improve Wikipedia's articles related to crime in the United Kingdom. For guidelines see WikiProject British crime and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale.

Contents 1 Dates 2 GA Review 3 i am apcerlutly discusted ! 4 GA Sweeps (kept)

[edit] Dates

As Victoria Climbié was born in 1991 and died in 2000, and the Victoria Climbié Murder Case was not born in 1991 and did not die in 2000, I would like to suggest that this article should either be removed from the Category of 1991 Births and 2000 deaths, or that its name should change to simply Victoria Climbié. (I say 2000 deaths but the article actually says 2001 deaths due to a typo) --Methegreat 23:27, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Although written by a single user in one edit, teh referencing, prose, and tone are all GA quality. Illustration with images seems like it would be possible, but it is not necessary. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 18:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] i am apcerlutly discusted !

i think that this sort of abuse that victoria got to her is discusting and i would'nt even call them people that done this terable tragidy to her they are more like animals ! when i read up on this today i was so discusted that anyone could ever do this especilly to a child. i think they should suffer themselves and see how they like it, they will never learn there lesson otherwise, i hope they get treated really badly ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.61.187 (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps (kept)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 06:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)