Talk:Muller's ratchet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Genetics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to genetics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this page, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating.

	This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

A summary of this article appears in Evolution of sex.

This article needs loads of rewriting. The introductory concept is very vague, and it also fails to indicate the importance of random drift in spreading and fixing the deleterious mutants. Defining the Muller's ratchet as happening in asexual populations is perhaps innapropriate, it is simply better to define it as what happens in chromosomes when there is lack of recombination. There is recombination in asexual genomes, so this is not a simple feature of asexual populations, also, some sexual populations show non-recombinant regions, so again the definition is not appropriate. A figure showing the ratchet mechanisms would be very useful.

80.41.59.236 11:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The statement "It is instead quite clear that the genomes of mitochondria and chloroplasts do not recombine and would undergo Muller's ratchet were they not as small as they are" is 100% BS. In fact, mitochondria have multiple copies (65 each in humans) of their circular chromosomes, and they many recombine within a mitochondria for all we know (or between mitochondria inside a cell, since most cells have dozens of of them). Certainly their smallness in no way leads to their avoiding Muller's ratchet--after all, some bacteria are smaller. 129.252.89.201 06:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)speciate

Are you guys editing or just making old fogey style comments? Samsara (talk • contribs) 15:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The comments are well put I say. No matter whether an effect makes sense in theory - if it cannot be proven in vivo, to hell with the theory! This is the life sciences, not philosophy class.

So... where has it been found? Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 06:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)