Talk:Muhammad ibn al Uthaymeen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Islam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Muslim scholars task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Peace be upon him (Islam)
I have removed the instances of these Arabic phrases as per consensus that salla Allahu alayhi wa sallam, "SAW", "PBUH" and other such blessings after mentioning Muhammad (including radhi Allahu anhu—or "may Allah be pleased with him"—after the names of sahaba and other venerable Muslims) have no place in a Wikipedia article ... no disrespect is intended by the ommission, but this represents a non-WP:NPOV bias that many non-Muslims find offensive, and it has been the source of frequent revert wars in many articles. —72.75.85.159 (talk · contribs) 02:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suspected POV by article monitors
I do not know why when pictures are added to show the face of scholars like Uthaymeen, Ibn Baz or Albaanee they are quickly deleted!! Or like in this artcicle, they show pictures with no faces. It is commonly known that Wahabism is against picture taking and I am wondering if Wikipedia should be abiding by Wahabi rules not to show Wahabi scholars pics or just restores pictues that were deleted and or face covered. Chubeat8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chubeat8 (talk • contribs) 05:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please review the official Wikipedia:Civility policy and the Wikipedia:Assume good faith behavioral guideline. Throwing out accusations of bias is not the way to help improve articles. MezzoMezzo 06:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi arabia.jpg
Image:Saudi arabia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Are the biggots supposed to be this interested in Islam ?
First of all there is no such thing as wahhabism. Second pictures are not forbidden by ur so called wahhabis.
No worries i might as well go around erasing everything that offends me on wikipedia, since ur excellency is not happy with the prophet's titles PBUH
"wahhabi standards" ??? What a biggot u r
