User talk:Muchness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives
  1. 2005
  2. 2006-01–2006-06
  3. 2006-07–2006-11
  4. 2006-12–2007-02
  5. 2007-03–2007-07
  6. 2007-08–2008-02

Contents

[edit] Chaubaby

Thankyou very much for the information. I will revert my edits regarding this matter. αѕєηιηє t/c 12:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem, just wanted to let you know about the on-going discussion. --Muchness (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Infinite Parameters Possible?

Well, no, but ain't it best to keep all possibilities open?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 09:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

(Replied at Template talk:Wiktionarypar‎#Infinite Parameters Possible?.) --Muchness (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
What is the code for infinte parameters?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
An arbitrary string of text? What is an arbitrary string of text?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 03:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes please and thank you.Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
And "...definitions...". What do you mean by "...definitions..."?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 05:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
O ya sure, that really helps. Hey thanks really for you time, that was a lot of effort, thank you. I've seen, or I thought I've seen a way to have infinite paramters with out explicitly typing it out? I think {{main}} has something like that, or {{seealso}}. I don't know, I'm not too sure. What do you think?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 07:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
It was no trouble. The templates you mentioned have limited numbers of parameters and work the same way as {{wiktionarypar}} – {{main}} has a maximum of 10 and {{see also}} has a maximum of 15. {{multidel}} is an example of a template that has unlimited values; like the example I gave earlier you have to type it all out. --Muchness (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
So never at any point in any of the {{main}} or {{seealso}} versions did they have any way codewise to express infinite parameters? Cause I thought they did, at least at one point (in one of the versions). Maybe they changed the metawiki program..... eh.?Asrghasrhiojadrhr (talk) 07:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Not as far as I'm aware, if you're curious you can review the histories of the templates and see how previous versions functioned. --Muchness (talk) 08:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] michael riccardi

This of the infamous man who attempted to kill a revrand in new york ¬Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.251.125 (talk) 05:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Can you add source info to the Image:Michael Riccardi.jpg image description page, so that the photo's veracity can be confirmed? Because the photo at present the page states that the photo was created on 09/18/2008; it depicts a youth but Riccardi was 27 at the time of the assassination. --05:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I have added the appropriate information i think the person who entered that just put the day they added the image —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.251.122 (talk • contribs) 05:43, 20 March 2008
Thank you, I'll make a note of this at the deletion listing. --Muchness (talk) 06:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Red Ant Enterprises

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Red Ant Enterprises, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gazimoff (talk) 11:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. This article probably should be deleted as non-notable. --Muchness (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfC on Cebactokpatop

Hi, I want to query you on moving the RfC on Cebactokpatop. Since the page was created by Allyne, who wants an RfC on Cebactokpatop, and I signified my agreement and added to the page, it seems clear that the two-person threshhold has been met? Seminarist (talk) 00:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, please ensure the certifiers add their sigs to the Users certifying the basis for this dispute subsection, and feel free to move the RfC to the approved section at WP:RFCC. Thanks and regards. --Muchness (talk) 01:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair warning

Hiya! I noticed you reverted the Solanum (virus) article to its previous rediect. I did that too, and got an inquire from Apocmonk (talk · contribs) about why I reverted his edits. I just want to let you know you may get a similar message. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the warning; it looks like a straightforward hoax – the article's references were all non-existent. We should probably warn him with {{uw-hoax}} if he persists, unless he can provide some references that aren't spurious. --Muchness (talk) 00:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oakyuz

Thanks for letting me know- I've given him a final warning, and I am just going on new image patrol now, so if I see any of his... J Milburn (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for your attention to this matter. --Muchness (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)