User talk:Mtxchevy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Suggestion Just a small suggestion: use the Show Preview button instead of the save page button. Then you can gradually make changes, fix your own typos, et cetera, and once it is complete you can click on Save Page. That also cuts down on the edits in the history, which makes it easier for others to track who changed what. Sir Isaac Lime 01:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Response to ORV edit comment With all due respect, you have an entire article to glorify and give a how-to on ORVs. Edward Abbey was not some obscure American writer. He was quite famous and he was a very loud (although not always politically-correct) voice on conservation. I'd suggest that instead of removing a quote that puts a human voice on the damage caused by ORVs, you continue to build the strength of your article in other areas. Also- I do not wish to personally attack you. Thanks for understanding. Also- there is nothing stopping you from discrediting Abbey too. He had lots of enemies as well as fans, and I'm sure you can find something.

[edit] ORVs

I don't have a problem with a list, although I don't know how you can objectively draw a line between what belongs and what doesn't. Having what could potentially be such a long list in the article would be just too much. Dismas|^(talk) 15:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Sounds fine but ORV should be expanded to off-road vehicles and Popular Culture should not be capitalized according to article naming standards. Also, film and television show titles should be in italics, songs in double quotes, and album titles in italics as well. This is all in the MoS. And yes, I'm an off roader too. Member of the Vermont Jeep Assoc. and moderator of the Quadratec bulletin board. Dismas|^(talk) 16:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NSRA.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:NSRA.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mhra.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Mhra.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)