User talk:Msoamu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "challenge" on your user page, but I will remind you that this website is an encyclopedia, not a battleground. --Firien § 09:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barelwi

Please do not rewrite this page to your own point of view. As I mentioned above this is an encyclopedia - at the moment your actions combine those of a vandal (deleting information) with the argument you are trying to present. Please make your contributions - but make them in a way that adds to the information of others, rather than destroying that information. There are many resources available on how to write pages so that your edits are not removed. I suggest following these guidelines and rules, since ignoring them will result in reversion of your work.

Your contributions are welcome here, but so are those of others. --Firien § 13:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Polite notice

Hi, re your edit here, please consider only putting forward constructive views as it appears to be a personal attack which is not allowed by the policy. Thanks. → AA ^(talk) — 13:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recent article creation

A tag has been placed on Salat-o-Salam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MezzoMezzo 16:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I did not delete anything, as I am just an editor; only Wikipedia administrators have the ability to delete pages; please review the official Wikipedia:Deletion policy. As for your accusations against me on my talk page and other pages, please review the official Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility policies. MezzoMezzo 19:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] POV

Please do not insert your own personal point of view into articles, as you did here and here. This is in violation of the official Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. MezzoMezzo 17:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

First of all, please review the official Wikipedia:Ownership of articles policy; I do not own these articles and neither do you so please don't act as though i'm violating some sort of rights of yours by following the Wikipedia:Be bold editing guideline.

Second of all, the news articles are both expressly marked as opinion/comment columns and not objective fact; that Deobandis are hardliners and Barelwis are moderates is merely an opinion and while it can serve as an external links, it is a blatant violation of the official Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy to base article content off of it.

Third of all, you these policies do need to be brought to your attention because not only do you seem unaware of them but you're also openly disregarding them. If you aren't willing to abide by the rules then your input may be disregarded.

Also, this is the second time you've trolled my talk page. You are welcome to post constructive commentary but if you launch personal attacks on me again you will be reported. You have been warned. MezzoMezzo 18:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

It appears that rather than defend your position you've resorted to edit warring and you need to review the Wikipedia:Edit war guideline and the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing behavioral guideline in regard to that. Additionally, you called me a Wahhabi in your edit summary which, as a derogatory term, constitutes a violation of the official Wikipedia:No personal attacks policy. Please cease this behavior at once and review the official Wikipedia:Resolving disputes policy as it is quite relevant here. MezzoMezzo 19:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Msoamu, regardless of whatever content disputes editors may fall into, we must refrain from derogatory name-calling as per WP:NPA; it doesn't help foster an atmosphere of collegial editing, and makes dispute resolution more difficult. thanks. ITAQALLAH 12:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

It seems you and I got off to the wrong foot; I am glad that we can disagree politely with one another now. People will always have disagreements, but it's nice to log in to Wikipedia and find someone doing so in a respectful manner. Thanks for the help on improving the Barelwi and Deobandi articles so far, I look forward to hearing from you again. MezzoMezzo 03:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Kanzul Iman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kanzul Iman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanzul Iman. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 18:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Kanzul Iman.jpg

[edit] help in Hazrat shahwilayt Article

As u have good Interest in Sunni and Sufi related Articles i need ur Help in keeping Hazrat Sharfuddin Shah Wilayat Sahab (R.A). Shabiha 23:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help is needed

Your urgent help is needed in editing Barelwi article.Shabiha ^(t 11:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No content in Category:AhleSunnat Wal Jamat Barelwi

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:AhleSunnat Wal Jamat Barelwi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:AhleSunnat Wal Jamat Barelwi has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:AhleSunnat Wal Jamat Barelwi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Three-revert rule

You appear to have made some reverts lately on Barelwi. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. If you continue reverting, you risk being blocked from editing. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Stifle (talk) 16:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)