User talk:Msalmon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Msalmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for joining our community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. First thing: be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree. Here are some links you might find useful:

And for more detailed information:

  • Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors
  • Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters.

You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia.

All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing!   --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Leicester Haymarket Busstat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leicester Haymarket Busstat.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jennie's exemption

Hi there, do you know for sure that she is exempt from nominating? If you are speculating, it shouldn't be added. Thanks. --Alex9891 15:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Jennie is immune from being nominated, not exempt from nominating. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three Revert Rule

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. — FireFox (talk) 16:06, 7 August '06

[edit] Three Revert Rule

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. — FireFox (talk) 17:51, 9 August '06

You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. — FireFox (talk) 17:56, 9 August '06

[edit] Re: Before where?

Before I started butchering it :P --talk to JD wants e-mail 10:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The table of contents on the Big Brother 7 UK article

Thank you for changing the position of the table of contents yet again, with total disregard to the comment I made on the article's talk page. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I didn't do anything to it, someone else did it while I was editing talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

This diff says you moved the TOC back to where it is now. I'm not here to start an argument about it, but if you have a good reason for it not being where it was, could you please bring it up on the article's talk page? talk to JD wants e-mail 09:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Look, I just left it where it was I only moved it once and that was it. I don't mind it being where it was talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm moving it back then, that's okay with you? talk to JD wants e-mail 09:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, fine but don't blame me for something I didn't do. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm only saying you did it because the diff says you did it, and as somebody once said, "The diff doesn't lie". If you take offence to that, I'm sorry. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I know that but someone else moved it while I was editing something else. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

It would have appeared as a separate revision in the article's edit history had that been the case. In all honesty, I'd have dropped this ages ago, and still will, if you're willing to do the same. There's really no need to drag it out as far as it is going. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Lets just forget about it. talk to Mslamon wants e-mail 10:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Fine by me. talk to JD wants e-mail 09:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Source

Hi, do you have a source for the Celebrity Big Brother 5 info? --Alex (talk here) 22:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Celebrity Big Brother

Please stop going against consensus, and read the talk pages. If you have a problem, comment before you take action, as moving all the pages to where they are now took a lot of effort from a lot of people. jd || talk || 09:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

If you want to change it (which I don't see why you need to) please rewrite the intro or change the name back to what it was, otherwise it looks wrong. User:Msalmon 10:38, 23 October 2006

Was it not already rewritten? jd || talk || 09:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

No, on CBB5 (oops I meant 3) it say "CBB5 was the third season of Celebrity Big Brother". Does that look rewritten to you? Msalmon 10:46, 23 October 2006

Yes, it does. Celebrity Big Brother 5 isn't the fifth season of the series, as there were only two seasons before it. jd || talk || 11:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Genie in the House

Hi! I'm sorry to bother you, but do you, by any chance, know where I can find screencaps and/or videos of the episode Out of our Minds? I really want to see it! I hope you can help me! Thanks. Miss.Hazelnut 25 October 2006

Sorry, I can't help you but y did u come 2 me? Msalmon 21:03 25 Oct 06

[edit] List of Kim Possible episodes

Hey Msalmon! Thanxs for all your work in moving the episodes in order or air date. However, the talk page reached a consensus and all episodes were organized according to production code. Check the talk page before making major edits, in case the issue was already discussed before. I had to revert back to the original version. Sorry about that. Keep up the good work and have fun editing! =) Jumping cheese Cont@ct 23:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't episodes be ordered in list of episode number because 'Bueno Nacho' wasn't the first episoded aired it was 'Crush'. See [1] for episode order. Msalmon 19 Dec 2006 09:30am

Yeah, but something about how Disney does not air them in the correct order. ^_^ Jumping cheese Cont@ct 10:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Big Brother 2007

As various sources have confirmed, Chanelle has asked to leave. Despite the fact that she has to stay for a while longer, she can no longer be regarded as a HM as she has techincally left. Futher reverting could break WP:3RR and could be classed as vandalism. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 17:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

She hasn't left yet so she is still a housemate

I agree with you reverting the edits as she has not left :) Babygurl1853 18:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BB8 UK Nom. Table

It's polite to discuss the matter first (but from seeing your talkpage i can see this isn't always the case) on the articles talk page. You revert the article (to a bad version i may add) when so far you are the only person to disagree with it. -- Halo2 Talk 19:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Go back to two tables then, personally I think that the main table will look crammed and funny with it in. Msalmon User talk:Talk 20:34, 6 August 2007
Yes exactly, "you think", that's the point of a talk page to discuss it. The problem at the moment is that there is no point having the total nominations, it doesn't show anything. (You may also want to fix your signature if you haven't doe so already.) -- Halo2 Talk 19:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 10:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)