User talk:Mrshovels
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scouting for Girls, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Scouting for Girls was changed by Mrshovels (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-29T15:25:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Darragh Hurley.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Darragh Hurley.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Darragh Hurley.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Darragh Hurley.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Dar1.PNG
A tag has been placed on Image:Dar1.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. GtstrickyTalk or C 17:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Eoin hurley, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall talk 18:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Darragh Hurley
Please dont create non-notable pages such as this in future; any comments or questions you can reach me on my talk page.
- No, simply because of the lack of notability. if you google "darragh hurley" you have his bebo page and the wikipedia article coming up as 2 of the 3 first links. The language used is also not very encyclopedic; "In January 2008, he began learning the Saxaphone. He's not very good though. " isnt really needed content.
- thanks for replying so promptly, and also for instituting the changes i advised. While at one point you could have googled Wayne Rooney and not found anything of note, this would be because at that point Rooney wasnt noteable. notability or not is based on their PRESENT situation, not if they could become famous in future. I also note one of the external links is a youtube one; i dont think this is really appropriate either, its not like its "2 girls one cup". sorry if i sound a bit pretentious, its honestly not my intention! and thanks again for being so helpful.
