User talk:Mrblondnyc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives
/Archive 1


Contents

[edit] From a ***** who refuses to follow the rules

I did not vandalize anything, you need to read the notes, before making assumtions, {Someone copied the filmography section I CREATED on the main page and put just that filmography on a seperate page, then linked it back to the main page, making it redundant information because, the only stuff on the seperate page was the exact same as on the main page, which was just plain stupid and was just wasting space}. If you read the notes you will see that.Rogue Gremlin 03:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No thanks, Cause I take it you didn't read the notesRogue Gremlin 02:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

There was a note there asking for an admin to remove, for the reasons i had stated, just because you fail to be able to comprehend anything is not my fault. So Please do this ***** a favor and DO NOT respond Rogue Gremlin 03:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • I asked you nicely to please do not respond. Please quit STALKING me. Does wiki have a policy on stalkers like you?Rogue Gremlin 01:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Don Rickles

Will you take a look at the Talk:Don Rickles page, and under "Los Angeles or Florida" tell me what you think? Thanks.

[edit] August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 12:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jon Stewart

Jon Stewart received heavy editing today by unregistered users and may benefit from a good review. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 07:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What citation is needed in Paul Mooney article?

This is a stand-up comedy, how can citation be made?

BlackAsker 21:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heber

Someone alerted me to a free version of the California index - it can be searched at http://www.familytreelegends.com/records/39461. I added a citation from that to Heber's article. Hope that helps. Cheers, Mad Jack 21:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quotectomy

I appreciate your bold edit to History of Family Guy. Just so you know, WP:FGjokebook is something I dreamed up one night. While it's reasonably consistent with WP:NOT, there has not been a consensus review of any sort, so I wouldn't yet call it a "guideline", even within WP:FG purposes.

I'd call a convention of the WP:FG editors to see if we can establish a consensus, but current participation is very low, and the active editors tend to object to guidelines that exclude anything.

If interested, you'd certainly be welcome to sign up. / edg ☺ ★ 21:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.


Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 00:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:OriginalGeorgeCarlinLP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OriginalGeorgeCarlinLP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thebabe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thebabe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Let's-Do-It-Again-Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Let's-Do-It-Again-Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New York City Meetup

The Brooklyn Bridge New York City Meetup


Next: Saturday November 3rd, Brooklyn Museum area
Last: 8/12/2007
This box: view • talk • edit

The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there! --Pharos 20:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:75akaufman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:75akaufman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Greetingsposter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Greetingsposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:MorkMindy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MorkMindy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Streetsurvivorsorig.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Streetsurvivorsorig.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Indie holofcener.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Indie holofcener.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Television programs based on plays

Hi, Could you be careful with this category - you seem to be adding it to films. Thanks, --BelovedFreak 21:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, my apologies then. I have a different understanding of the word, but as you created the category, I'll let you define it. I reverted a few of your additions by the way, so sorry about that. However, The Laramie Project (film) doesn't seem to be defined as a television film either on it's article or by imdb.--BelovedFreak 22:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh yeah, didn't notice it was in "American television films"; thanks for clearing that up! --BelovedFreak 22:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eq01a katia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eq01a katia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ArthurDVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ArthurDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MurphysRomance2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MurphysRomance2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NEW-dvd-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NEW-dvd-1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Monumentave.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Monumentave.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You're invited!

...to the next New York City Meetup!

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday January 13th, Columbia University area
Last: 11/3/2007
This box: view • talk • edit

In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pp video.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pp video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Oddcouple.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oddcouple.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Razor84.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Razor84.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Robin.mork.pam.mindy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Robin.mork.pam.mindy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Sunset Boulevard (2008 film)

An editor has nominated Sunset Boulevard (2008 film), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset Boulevard (2008 film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Guest stars on The Wire

I notice you've made a few alterations to the guest star lists for recent The Wire episodes. Could I ask if you have a source for any of your changes? I'm confused as you stated on Not for Attribution that Vincent M. Ward played the pastor but then changed this back to show that he played Butchie's bodyguard. What changed your mind? Also on React Quotes you changed John Badila to a newspaperman. Was there a source for this? I thought from looking at a photo of Badila on google images that he was the desk sergeant but this is just guess work on my part.--Opark 77 (talk) 14:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Also I note that you added an M. initial to Scott Templeton and Alma Gutierrez - what was the source for this?--Opark 77 (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I re-googled those actors before posting here and definitely agree that you are right (on the desk sergeant). You are right that I am working from guesses and google. I hoped you ahd a more concrete method I could adopt! Isn't Sophia Wang Sonja Sohn's daughter? I think that was my thinking on that one, I came across a report of her being in the episode in a sweet scene and made the assumption on that.--Opark 77 (talk) 18:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
LOL. You certainly proved I needed one with Bobby J. Brown! That would be great.--Opark 77 (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lar_larabee.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lar_larabee.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theoddcouple.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Theoddcouple.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Water .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Water .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Walkingtalking.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Walkingtalking.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:20051006 106 350x263.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20051006 106 350x263.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carney2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carney2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fernwood09.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fernwood09.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kwamepolkadots .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kwamepolkadots .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Happydays02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Happydays02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MorkMindy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MorkMindy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Raylene Lee

Hey MrBlondNYC. I got the surname for Raylene Lee from the H file closeups in The Dickensian Aspect. She is down as a Lee on there. I was particularly proud of getting Bug's name - Aaron Manigault - as it is only in focus as the Bunk turns the page. Kind of sad really :( --Opark 77 (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jamal

Hey, you recently added an appearance in "Unto Others" for Jamal - I don't recall seeing him past the third season. Where did he pop up in that episode?--Opark 77 (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New mailing list

There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You are invited!

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday March 16th, Columbia University area
Last: 1/13/2008
This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oc2.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Oc2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Season 4 credits

Noticed you made some edits to "Soft Eyes" today, if you do get a chance to check the credits from the article against the credits from the episode could you put them in number order? I mean change the bullets (*) to numbers (#). It is the first 2 that I haven't been able to do.--Opark 77 (talk) 10:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] John Leguizamo

You want to talk facts, then we will talk facts. This has nothing to do about my heritage pride. The fact is that there are many reliable verifiable sources out there which state that his father is Puerto Rican, among them the "New York Times" in the following article: A Mambo King Speaks Words of Comedy; By GLENN COLLINS; Published: January 23, 1991. But, hold it, believe it or not I'm going with you on this one. Leguizamo does state in his bio. that his dad is 1/2 Puerto Rican. Here is a funny thing, I found a site that states that his mother is 1/2 P.R., so you go figure. So, I guess we're cool, right? Tony the Marine (talk) 05:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

1/4 Puerto Rican, 1/4 Italian and 1/2 Colombian? Sounds like he had two dads and one mom then. If you keep tracking back into people's ancestries by percentage I would be 1/3 African, 1/5 Taino, 1/7 Spanish, and not Puerto Rican at all. No one would be 100% anything either. ~RayLast «Talk!» 13:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
You obviously didn't get what I said, which has nothing to do with math. Nice brain work genius. ~RayLast «Talk!» 03:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Not to make this an issue, since Leguizamo does state in his bio that he is 1/4 this, 1/4 that and so on. To a certain point I understand that said information is posted with a reliable source as required by Wiki policy (I myself, saw the entery in his bio). But, what I ask myself is "Why even bother posting that in the article"? I can understand some people being curious as to the parents of the subject, but who cares from where a subjects grandparents, great-grandparents and so on came from? What is the point? What does this information add to the encyclopedic nature of the article? Tony the Marine (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Super Fight

Per the cover and the official site, the imdb seems to be on error and this should be all one word, superfight. Is it possible you could move it to the correct title, or could I request such a move with your consent? 86.44.28.245 (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I see you say it was originally released under this title, never mind then. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 04:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bringing Out The Dead

Hello, I believe that you posted a tone tag to the Bringing Out The Dead article... If so, would you mind checking my attempt to clean it up. Thanks. BubbaStrangelove (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I can't figure out where the tag came from, but thanks for taking a look... and for the seal of approval! BubbaStrangelove (talk) 08:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday June 1st, Columbia University area
Last: 3/16/2008
This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)