User talk:Mr Keck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lyndon LaRouche, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Welcome!

Hello, Mr Keck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  - ·:·Will Beback ·:· 22:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Youtube

Thakns for your note. Linking to Youtube has been controversial. Wikipedia talk:External links/YouTube is a collection of tens of thousands of words discussing the matter. At times there has been a ban on linking to Youtube. However I see in Wikipedia:External links# Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites that the end result is that there is currently no general ban. So it was my mistake. I'll revert my deletion. Cheers, ·:·Will Beback ·:· 17:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lyndon LaRouche.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
This message delivered: 00:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC).

[edit] NathanDW and Dont lose that number now banned

I was shocked to learn that both these editors have been indef blocked for the offense of restoring a link at the article Chip Berlet that was deemed to violate BLP. In my opinion, if someone can be banned for restoring a link, then Cberlet and Dking have been getting away with murder in terms of BLP violations. I would encourage you to make requests on their talk pages that they clean up their act and stop violating policy. If they fail to do so, two or more of us should file WP:RFC on them. --Marvin Diode 23:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Links in quotations

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Quotation. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppet

This account has been blocked as a sock or meat puppet of banned user:Herschelkrustofsky. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I haven't done anything wrong, and I have no idea who "Herschelkrustofsky" is."

Decline reason: "A mere denial is not persuasive. The contribution pattern, involving LaRouche content etc., matches that of Herschelkrustofsky. — Sandstein 10:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Technical and textual evidence shows that you are, in fact, the same person, or someone acting as the same person. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)