User talk:Mr Congeniality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:24-6x15mainimage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:24-6x15mainimage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Automated notice by OrphanBot. 03:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Christiantroy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Christiantroy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:24-6x14mainimage.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:24-6x14mainimage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. Thank you. OsamaK 09:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Avamoore.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Avamoore.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. Thank you. MER-C 07:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Barrettmoore.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Barrettmoore.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. BetacommandBot 15:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:TV14-V.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:TV14-V.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Licensing has been correctly set as {{PD-self}}.
Mr Congeniality (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reese's Cups Trivia Section
I will remove it again as it is NOT a trivia section but a section showing references in popular culture. This can, therefore, not be integrated into the rest of the article and needs its own section. jimbo (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Although I agree with you, the majority of users are not. It may involve references in popular culture, but to some users it may be classified as trivia as well. Mr Congeniality (talk) 03:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Johnhensley.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Johnhensley.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Spam in Stacker 2
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stacker 2, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stacker 2 is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stacker 2, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)