User talk:Mr.Z-man/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Mr.Z-man/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Kf4bdy 18:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Gabriel Richard

I have moved this article to the correct title with respect to our naming standards. There is no need to change the links to the article regardless as redirects automatically take you to the article. Rmhermen 20:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Tadeus Reichstein

You edited this article to change "synthesizing" to "synthesizing". Note however that the first is the correct spelling in British English and Wikipedia convention is not to change the variety of English an article is written in from that of the original author unless the topic is clearly about a subject that relates to a particular style of English. An article about a Polish chemist who worked in Switzerland has no need to be in any particular style so the spellings of the original author should be preserved. Rmhermen 20:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:40, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Geography Cup

I didn't add that; that was IP #87.112.95.96's edd. All I did was add a category; here's my edits. Neutralitytalk 16:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


Your VandalProof Application

Dear Grhs126student,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that Your edit count is too low. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Hamilton, Ontario

Great job with the cleaning up of the vandalism on the Hamilton, Ontario page! Thanks for cleaning up the mess.Nhl4hamilton 09:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Currie Graham
Steve Holland
Flag of Paraguay
Southland Region
Lorraine Segato
Nichi Vendola
Cluj-Napoca Botanical Garden
Freaked
World Anti-Doping Agency
Compuware Sports Arena
Lisa Ling
Southland District
Cobo Hall
Xbox Linux
Southland Rugby
Waterdown, Ontario
World-Point Academy of Tourism
1944 Summer Olympics
Third-World Feminism
Cleanup
Howard High School
University of Detroit Jesuit High School and Academy
Wart
Merge
Battle of Sinop
Life and work of Ludwig van Beethoven
Dominant-party system
Add Sources
Touch typing
Giancarlo Peris
Dick Fosbury
Wikify
Corey Clark
Black Enterprise
Gnomonic projection
Expand
Alexander Thomson
Juan Sebastián Elcano
The Four Lands

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Grhs126student! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 03:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Borat Page

Thanks for your vigilant editing, but I feel you were incorrect to modify my edit to the Borat page. In the film, Borat clearly says that his wife's vagin "hangs like sleeve of wizard" as opposed to the previously incorrect statment, "loose like skin of lizard." If you feel that he says this elsewhere in his work please add that seperately, but it is clear this is not what he says in the movie. I will gladly provide you citations if you feel this is incorrect. Thanks. --Bongadorus 19:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mr.Z-man! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome templates

Thank you for telling me that, I really wasn't sure where to put the template. Thanks!OrinLincoln | TalkContributions 00:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Nepassa - Help me out here.

I see you dealt with this article yesterday. Since I didn't see it then, maybe you could weigh-in on the talk page about what has gone before. I'm tring to be reasonable, but the editor is very persistant. NipokNek 20:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Homerpalooza

Hi, you recently did a GAC review of the article Homerpalooza and made some helpful suggestions. I made some changes to the article, and I was willing if you'd be willing to take a look before I renominate it as a GA. I changed the main image and I made some changes to the synopsis, but I didn't lengthen it too much. I don't like long Synopsises and I think a basic overview of the main plot is more preferable. So, if you could take a look, it would be much appreciated. Thanks, Scorpion 18:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Just a test?

Did you create LOOSE ENDS to test speedy tags? BuickCenturyDriver 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

It seems that sometimes wiki enhancement software can play tricks on you, an item shows up even though someone already beat you to the punch in taking care of it. BuickCenturyDriver 23:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Margaret River

vndl wants to be blocked by the looks of it SatuSuro 00:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Beans & Weenies (Camp Lazlo)

Why do you want to delete it? On most pages, all they put is "this article is a stub. Please help by expanding it." You wouldn't delete those, so don't delete mine.20:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

B&W2

Well than fix it instead of deleting it! Don't count your chickens before the hatch, Mr.Z-man. *Gokufistum20:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

hello i want to help fight vandalism such as the article about tucson

hi, i am so cool —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smartpersonandbob (talk • contribs) 16:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC).

Great Job

I just wanted to thank you for the great job you do vandal fighting! I love to see your reports at WP:AIV because I know they have been proplery warned and all I gott do it hit that block button! In honor of your excellent work, i award you a shiny barnstar (see below)! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC) (barnstar moved to userpage)

League of Copyeditors participation drive!

Dear League member,

We've started a participation drive for the remainder of February. If you can, please help clear the backlog by adopting the following goals each week:

Thanks for your help! BuddingJournalist 01:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your translation on Wendel Investissement. I appreciate it! KevinPuj 04:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the evil Red Hood 2

Jason is a supervillain. He kills people, betrays Batman, and I think that enough classifies him as a supervillain. If you want, you could say he was a fallen superhero and a new supervillain. Happy editing! 65.101.86.69 22:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)65.101.86.69

Thanks for the non-profit infobox

Thank you for honouring my {{Infobox Non-profit}} request. ThijsN 12:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Gallery of beloniform fishes

Whoa... not so fast Mr Z-man! Peer review of the Halfbeak artice has suggested that the images there be moved off onto their own gallery page. It made sense to widen that to include other Beloniformes as well (needlefish, etc.). I'm actually still working on it... I'm staggered you found the thing so fast!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Halfbeak

Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 17:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the amicable solution! Appreciated. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 23:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

vandals. sigh.

Yeah, they're usually not the most mature folks. Sometimes I'm really thankful that Wikipedia didn't exist when I was twelve. Natalie 02:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

An update on Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Articles

The project has reached the quarter-way point for the work on the list of the oldest 1000 ("abandoned") articles in Wikipedia: 250 articles have been reviewed and updated!

The project now has 21 members. If you're no longer interested, please take your name off the list; you won't get any further messages like this one. On the other hand, if you're still interested, please consider signing up for a(nother) block of 10 articles to work on - if everyone did this, we'd be almost halfway through those 1000 articles!

Finally, please note that project approach has changed slightly - there is now a section for editors to place articles that need to be "adopted", or to adopt articles that need further work. This means that if you find an article in a block of ten that needs more work than you have time for, it has a place to be put.

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Adoption (reply)

It's really kind of you to offer to adopt me. Thanks! Balikem 18:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

afd

"nominated for deletion: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Jonas" I was getting to that.  :) ~a (user • talk • contribs) 23:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Trivial question

Hello,Z-man. I was wondering. Did the inspiration for your username come from Tom Zenk? :) PeaceNT 03:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Db-autobio

Template:Db-autobio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Part Deux 14:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

for sorting my stub. Carlossuarez46 23:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Yes, the template is quite useful. I will use it from now on when I encounter such articles. Thanks! --Nevhood 01:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Geography Cup

I've commented on the article's FAC page, and object still. Honestly, you're better off trying for GA with that one, and hoping enough sources emerge later on for you to try FAC successfully. If you're interested in getting an FA, I think you'd be better off choosing an article which has more sources from which to use. LuciferMorgan 02:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Geography Cup copyedit on WP:LoCE

Hi there! Just wanted to let you know that I took one last look at this article and made some minor changes. Because you indicated that this article probably won't make FAC this time around, I've removed it from our active articles for copyedit lists. Please feel free to re-list if you make another FAC bid. Galena11 18:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


Illinois Railway Museum

My apologies for removal of information from the aforementioned page without an edit summary. I'm pretty new to this and am horrendously unfamiliar with accepted protocols. I have re-reverted the deletion edit, this time with an edit summary explaining the reason and a link to the I.R.M. website for use in verification that the deleted information was inaccurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.79.8.83 (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

In regards to [1]

It was bad content. Voretus 02:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Prod & notifying creator script

importScript('User:Dycedarg/easyprod.js');
importScript('Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI menu');
importStylesheet('Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI menu/css');

Opens in new window to notify creator; May need to use firefox. Add to User:Mr.Z-man/monobook.js

--Parker007 00:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Derek Erdman

Good work. Thanks. I have made a note on the AfD that I have changed my mind. --Richhoncho 00:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD HHO gas

Just to inform you that I deleted the links to the previous AfD's in the intro. IMHO it does not change anything so I thought you would not mind, but being thorough I wanted you to know and if needed you may amend your comment. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 02:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Nope, doesn't change my opinion at all. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 02:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Balikem

Hi Mr Z-man,

Concerning the use of adoptme & adoptoffer. I created adoptoffer to make sure that the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user did not become overloaded with users who had already offered adoption. Therefore if a user goes inactive better to leave it as adoptoffer so other Adopters don't waste their time. If the user wants another adopter at a later date the links from adoptoffer box explain how to do that. Cheers Lethaniol 19:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:Unclear

You made some edits to Template:Unclear and added it to Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup. However, the history of that template and the text on the template page state that it is only meant for MediaWiki help pages. So, what is the plan? Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for alerting me to this, I didn't notice. I've reverted unclear back to a previous version and created Template:Vague to do what I needed. Though in my defense, I'm not the only one to use unclear on articles: Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Unclear. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 22:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Batista article

I was trying to say that Batista took "the rope shaking gesture" from the ultimate warrior.´As the article was before, the word "gesture" was pointing to thumbs down gesture which is taken from hhh. I made a typo but hell you gave me a penalty?! I think that was a correction. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.220.184.37 (talk) 10:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC).

The Prestige GA review

Thank you for reviewing The Prestige (film). There are a number of proud editors who are happy it has been recognized as GA. Also, thank you for the Barnstar, but you should know that on both of those articles there are editors who played more significant roles than mine. I've passed your congratulations on to them.

—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  16:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


Jack Oliphant

I seconded your nom on Jack M Oliphant and added it to the AfD list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jemather (talk • contribs) 04:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC).

Vandals

Hi, I noticed that this user, User talk:164.58.148.2, was blocked in january and i found that he or she vandalized the chouteau oklahoma page just last week. Can you block them again?20:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Ethnic-group lists deletion discussions

Hi, I noticed you participated in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of African Americans (3rd nomination) deletion discussion. If you haven't participated in the very similar List of Chinese Americans discussion, which involves essentially the same issues, please do. I'll asking everyone who participated in one to participate in the other. I apologize for bothering you if you already have participated in both. Best wishes, Noroton 03:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Offer

I Noticed you were in the adopt a user program and I was wondering if you would Team up with me to make a place for training users under adoption. The page is called Adoptee Training Course Bloddyfriday 20:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

filthy note

Can you or someone please make the Filthy Note Records page please and I can help with info and stuff. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robert Coombs (talk • contribs) 02:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC).

credentials

It's closer than the other way round. Congratulations on opening up a new line of discussion. DGG 01:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

You have new questions at Editor review

The Transhumanist    05:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Your AfD closings

If you close Articles for deletions as a non-admin, please use "Snowball Keep" or "Speedy Keep" as opposed to just "Keep". Thanks, Cbrown1023 talk 01:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem, also try to put the result and templates above the header. Cbrown1023 talk 01:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Maybe I'm just being a stickler and you don't really have to do it, then. :) Cbrown1023 talk 01:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Now a friendly note, be careful about closing ones with very few !votes (like a nom, which would be one delete and two keeps) because some may yell at you about that, saying it is too close. Cbrown1023 talk 01:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh I see. :) But I wasn't really referring to myself, you can close as many as you like, I appreciate the help. :) Cbrown1023 talk 01:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Peptide

You removed a link to the Peptide Resource Page (PRP) ( *Peptide Resource Page ) for the Wikipedia article "Peptide" . The PRP is designed for scientists by a scientist and prior to its removal was listed with the "Peptide" article untouched for many months. PRP links are carefully chosen and annotated by hand. I would hope you would reconsider listing it and compare/contrast it to other sites that have appeared in the Peptide external links section which may indeed be less meaningful and purely automated spam. Thank you for your consideration.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.30.142.251 (talk) 15:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC).

Mariah Carey

I think we should delete the sections "Trivia" and "Quotes", because 1. There are no sources!!!!! 2. Quotes should be at wikiquote not wikipedia!!!


THANK YOU :-)23:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Editor review

I reviewed you. I forgot to add, don't get too caught up in the politics, like we had with Daniel Brandt and the Essjay affair. (Do as I say, not as I did. :] ) It can get distracting after a while; you need to remind yourself what you're trying to do here, and not get caught up in all those other things that go on. Best regards. YechielMan 01:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Stupid

First, we don't do these things by vote count (and if we did, the anon wouldn't have counted). Second, "stupid" is indeed not a reason, but it seems to me that the person who said that was simply trying to make a joke and really meant "per the above". More importantly, though, "being mentioned" doesn't count as external coverage. What matters is if they actually said something about the site. For instance, the mention at Foodnetwork is just an address in a list of many. The mention in Pcmag is also just a link in a web directory. What we're looking for in sites such as these is external coverage. For instance, this page lists sites that cover Wikipedia in actual news articles, as opposed to this list which shows sites which merely mention us. HTH! >Radiant< 09:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Mackinac Island

(barnstar moved to userpage) 19:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Hello Mr. Z-man - Thank you for your help editing Eprize. As you can tell I'm a newbie to this tool but amazed at your quick response and help. Now I have a base of understanding and can move from here! I will keep editing and adding... AlesyaO 19:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 21:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Autoroute

Hi, Mr. Z-man. I'm back. I've posted my initial arguments on Talk:Autoroute. Joeldl 09:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Are you ready to resume the mediation? Joeldl 03:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Mr.Z-man. Thank you very much for your help with Autoroute. You did a great job. I guess I didn't have the imagination to think that we could just get rid of the definition, etc., altogether. Joeldl 05:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The Catnip Peddlers Album Art:

Since the article is highly likely to be deleted, is there really a point in replacing the album art for that band? If so how small does the image need to be? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emevas (talk • contribs) 14:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC).

Alright, so as expected, the article got deleted, since it is a copyrighted image, and the article isn't likley to be resubmited, Is there any way I can speed up the deletion of the image? --Emevas 01:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay, thanks, It may or may not work. But thanks for that information.

Edit wAr

About the edit war on PCD (album) - do you think it's time to unprotect the pages? Discussion seems to have halted, and I'm a little uncomfortable leaving things locked for the full two months if the problem has blown over. Adam Cuerden talk 14:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Port cities in the Middle East

Hi. Thank for creating this category. I agree that Category:Port cities is overcrowd. However it will be better to categorize it by country and above this by region or Continent. Also the concept of Middle East is not defined well. For example Pakistan, as i know, is not part of this region. --Shmuliko 11:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Please adopt me :-)

Hi I'm XVreturns and i used to be a vandal but I want to make up for those times by fighting vandals. can you please adopt me? I'd be thrilled.:-) XVreturns 20:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, thank you so much! This means a lot! XVreturns 20:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skapsis

Hi. You commented that you thought this article was salvageable -- so can you help salvage it? I'm having a hard time finding anything that meets WP:OR and WP:V but maybe you can come up with something I couldn't find. I have added additional comments on the AfD page about looking for reliable sources.

If you can spare the time, I'd appreciate any help you can give us with this. Thanks, --A. B. (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for double-checking my work -- this one had me stumped. --A. B. (talk) 19:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Enjoy!

Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trampton 23:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates on the subject I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 20:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Locate Me

Thanks for you work, on the "locate me" template. Andy Mabbett 21:17, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Ref desk:Time

Sorry about that, but in my time zone it's not April 1st yet. My first reaction was "depends on what time zone" and my second was "don't feed the trolls". - AMP'd 02:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

example code

I hacked togerther a rough example of how to do what I suggested at User:CMummert/Sandbox.

But the more I think of it, I think that the following syntax might be better:

{{article issues|npov=y|npovdate=March 2006|cleanup=y|wikify=y|wikifydate=January 2006}}

That makes a clean separation between turning a issue on versus adding its date, and it would allow the automated tagging bots to add date parameters without having to edit what is already there, which might be easier for the bots to do. CMummert · talk 13:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. —dgiestc 18:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Uh....

Uh sir I never edited South Shore Long Island —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.237.221.200 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Are yew(u) happy now?

Are ya happy now cuz I changed the pic on muh(my) page to a pic I had on muh(my) computa(computer) dat I made..=] Pretty Ricky aint breakin up yall! yay!! Tam` Tam` =] 04:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

FAC

Regarding your note at Raul's page,[2] usually "no news is good news" at FAC. People object quickly to the troubled articles, but wait to see if anyone finds anything wrong on the articles that look solid. It looks good on first pass. I left you two notes in edit summary of work needed. See WP:DASH on the difference between hyphens, endash and emdash, and solo years shouldn't be linked per WP:MOSNUM. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Nice work

Wow! You beat me to both tagging Mohammad Ryan Abumehdi under db-bio and notifying the user. You're quick. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 21:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I found it on vandal patrol too ;-) The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 22:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Trevor Loflin

Please note that the section of SAT to which the page on Trevor Loflin was merged has been deleted, and for good reason; the information on Trevor Loflin was entirely inappropriate in that article. I have nominated the article on Mr. Loflin for deletion a second time. Based on your participation either in the article on Trevor Loflin or in the previous afd, you may wish to participate in the article's present deletion discussion. Thanks. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Articleissues template

I've now put the template in mainspace for trial, but now only have done for one article, parapsychology, I've posted it on village pump here. When it starts to be used more we'll see what happens. Thank you for designing it! WooyiTalk, Editor review 22:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Hmm not yet, since I don't do bots. So should we wait until the bots are done? WooyiTalk, Editor review 23:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay I won't mass-implement it yet. Possibly I'll also ask User:Gracenotes to look at it, he's an expert on template (and I believe you are as well :) ). Cheers! WooyiTalk, Editor review 23:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Your message 7 April

Thanks for the explanation re action, but I'm left wondering just how bad personal abuse has to be for someone to be blocked without any warnings. My observation as a relative newcomer to Wikipedia is that while the level 1, 2, 3 etc vandalism warning system is right for silly mucking up of articles by vandals for entertainment, the replacing of someone's user page with abuse in response to a warning, is in a different category which requires different actions. In the bricks-and-mortar world of say, a school environment, this is something which would be instinctively understood. Regards, Rexparry sydney 01:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC) (PS no reply expected)

Adopt-A-User program

Hello! I saw that you are available for an adoptee and wondered if you would consider me for one of your open slots. I haven't been here very long, but for the most part I have been cleaning up vandalism using Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool. I have recently become interested in stub-sorting and categorizing as well. I would like to venture into more involved article-editing, but I would like to get a better handle on Wikipedia's policies first. I am in general a very considerate editor and a stickler for spelling and grammar. Wikipedia makes my head want to explode sometimes, so I would just like to have someone I can ask all the random questions I come up with! :) Thanks! Literacola 02:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Blood purity

Wow, I wish that template was functional. I just removed removed them because they're basically clutter on the article, and on the talk page, they put it in weird categories for a talk page, so I linked them. As long as there is a template directing users to the talk page, I don't think we need more than one template on the article. I suppose I do have a vested interest, I'm a member of Wikipoject Harry Potter. John Reaves (talk) 04:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

My Template

Thanks, It works great! Asics talk Editor review! 19:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Question

Hey Mr.Z-man, thanks for the adopt! Could you please look over my edit at Academy of Richmond County and make sure I did it correctly, let me know what I could have done better, etc..? Thanks! --Literacola 23:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Infobox question

I added an infobox to the page Cold Spring Harbor Jr./Sr. High School but I can't figure out how to remove the "infobox needed" tag on its Talk page. Thanks! Literacola 21:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

hi

i just want 2 talk 2 some1HoneyBeeBABY 00:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Eminem edit

I removed it cause I didnt want to get into trouble.(Yes,I added the about.com rank).I heard someone say it was useless to put it up there so I removed it(im a new wikipedian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elif4ziggan (talk • contribs) 04:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

By the way Eminem aint a "fading" rapper!!He's gnna be back with an album in November '07.-User:Elif4ziggan. 05:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for everything.Elif4ziggan 06:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

XVreturns

I would like to know if there is an easier way to spot vandals than looking at every page top to bottom. User:XVreturns|Talk thank you for the info! XVreturns 00:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  • can you tell me about WikiDefCon and how it works?

XVreturns 22:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Is their a way to recover deleted pages?XVreturns 23:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • How many times does a user have to make vandalism before they are blocked? How can I block them? XVreturns 00:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I've encountered a strange problem:I've used one computer to get to wikipedia today and have found that it is in a smaller font than usual. I'm not sure if it is just my computer or it's the site. I'd like to know if the same has happened to you before contacting the foundation.
Thank you, I've fixed the problem. I wonder why I didn't think of that? XVreturns 19:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • WikidefCons down to 5, I guess we can relax a little. XVreturns 23:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

thank you so much for warning the IPvandal that attacked my page. I am against cursing in almost every way and I must thank you again. XVreturns 21:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Just wondering how you can customize your signature, like changing the font color. XVreturns 17:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! heres my new signature: XVRETURNS 20:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC) (P.S. tell me if you can't see it.)
  • Just wondering how you can get text to be on the side of a teplate such as WikiDefCon. I've been trying to but it hasn't been working out. Can you tell me how? XVRETURNS 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I mean how do you put text next to a table, like on your userpage. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by XVreturns (talk • contribs) 20:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
Thanks, I wondered how that was done. XVRETURNS 21:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:WPSchoolsAssessment

There are a lot of other infoboxes and there has been some discussion about trying to merge a bunch of them. From our perspective, as long as it is a school infobox (Rather than a company) it's not something the assessment group deals with. There is a category of them at Category:Education_infobox_templates and there has been some discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Schools/Archive_3#Infobox_template_proliferation there's no consensus as of yet. Adam McCormick 05:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

JudyWoodWhiteHat.jpg

I'm not sure if you noticed, but JudyWoodWhiteHat.jpg, seems pretty clearly to be taken from this Clemson University page. I'm not sure how it depicts a "non-reproducible historic event", it's a simple image found on the web. Pete.Hurd 03:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I was just about to editconflict putting a db|CSD I7 on it myself. One the AfD closes, I'll file a RFCU and see if we can clean out some of the spa socks. Pete.Hurd 03:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Cookbook

i would like the recipe in whatever other thing wikipedia does as a cookbook, then, please.Sudoku424 00:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Page Deletion From Chicag Gang Listing

Mr Z-man

I have noticed that some of the pages that I have been working on have been deleted, the last one due to a copyright violation. I am speaking of the following pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ambrose_%28Gang%29&action=edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan_Disciples

I am not sure how this is a copyright violation, if your speaking of the information coming from www.chicagogangs.org, I own, created, and run that site, so I am posting my own information. I am trying to contribute accurate and relevant information for all the gangs in chicago for wikipedia because there is none at this time. Its important that the information posted is relevant and accurate and I am trying to contribute, but I am not going to waste my time creating articles if they are going to be deleted the next day.

Please advise on how we can come to a resolve on this so that I am able to contribute the valuable information for these articles without having them deleted the very next day.

Chicagogangs 16:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC) ChicagoGangs

Edit to your talk page

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know I made this edit as in firefox and ie your talkheader box was lying on top of the new message box and the toc. All I did was give the new message and toc boxes some text to sit under, made it the same colour as the new message box and then moved the new message box up to cover the text over. I checked that it worked with firefox and ie, so hope I haven't ruined it for you if you use opera/safari.

Hope you don't think I'm being rude - if you think I was out of place I won't be offended if you just revert my edit. I just noticed the overlapping boxes and thought I'd try to help out (it's probably not the most elegant fix - but it's bodged it for now). ...adam... (talk • contributions) 10:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I put an extra <br clear.... in as firefox was still crushing it. Still looks fine in ie - so I'm guessing you are using that, and there wasn't really a problem. Hope it looks ok for you now and that it's readable. ...adam... (talk • contributions) 09:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)`

My RfA

Hi Mr.Z-man/Archive 1 and thank you for your support on my recent request for adminship. Unfortunately, the request failed, however I aim to improve the concerns that were brought up and hopefully bring myself up to the standards of admin. Once again, I thank you for your support. --KzTalk• Contribs 12:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries

(barnstar moved to userpage) 01:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:User Did You Know2

Thumbs up for improving the template that I initiated! The condition that you added should help quite a few users. I started the template to organize my number of DYK articles, and it took off from there. Royalbroil 02:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Categories vs Lists

Hi there,

I noticed your comment on the AfD for List of 3-D films and was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on the cat vs list concept. I read WP:Lists and WP:Cat and frankly can't see the advantage of one over the other. This list does seem useful to me, it seems to very easily meet the criteria for a good list. If I were looking for info about 3-D movies it would be a great place to start. But a category seems to have the same advantages. I'm going to ask the same question of the person stating the list option is better. Thanks!--killing sparrows 05:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiTimeline

I'm very very new to Wikipedia so be patient. Had a hard time figuring how to leave you a message. Perhaps my suggestion would be a major project but think WikiTimeline should be seperate (or a major subsection) with links to the main wiki. Haven't done any programming in 40 years so I have no idea how to help set up such a site. Would need tech help, etc. etc. Was hoping someone who knew what they were doing would like the idea and pick up the ball. In addition the the original idea, perhaps could add feature that would let user zoom in on topics/dates like the better map sites.

Thanks for your time,

Pete

Peterrwalker 05:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Untitled

Hey, I deleted your comment, I am trying to add the afd to the talk page and am unsuccessful. I put it back in the article before you gave me a Level 1 warning. I am new to this and trying to start a talk page over the afd. Editor never tried to resolve dispute or give me a chance to edit. It is a debate over verification and Secondary sources. I just created the article last night. help on sources would be great or conversation on talk page. Brentwood 00:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your incredibly helpful message! I will wait for the afd process and see what the consensus is. Brentwood 00:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Brentwood

thanks

umm..i just wanted to thank you for helping revert the punkalow entries vandalism. i keep switching it back to its proper state every other day, so it is nice to know of an ally. thanks again.

TrollE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.114.136.6 (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC).

Re: Template:Easier Version:WHOIS

Why can't anyone here try to accept that someone MIGHT be new here and MIGHT not know all the ropes of how wiki is to be used? SORRRRRRYYY that I hurt someone by accidentally placing my 256 KB of MySQL usage in the wrong place. I'll move it. Geez. JoshEdgar 00:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Greenbrier, TN

Hi. You saw that you just changed my edit to the article on Greenbrier, TN. I know for a fact that what I wrote is true because I lived there for several years and attended school there from kindergarten until graduation. Even some of the city officials are involved in the KKK. I'm currently looking for citations on this.

XxOderusUrungusxX 23:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: Greenbrier, TN

I understand. I've already found one article written by the president of Hendrix College in Arkansas who had an experience with the KKK in Greenbrier in the late 60's while visiting some family in the area. I want to see what else I can dig up on this because this is something that really needs to be known. It's the only way to get rid of the problem.

XxOderusUrungusxX 00:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Mackinac Island

Would you mind giving this article a thorough copyedit? Its currently at the top of the WP:LOCE requests for FAC section, it has needed it for a while. The first FAC actually failed (only objections were prose), but I plan on renominating it after it is copyedited. The main problems cited were redundant wording (wordliness) and unnecessary links. (link to the FAC). Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 00:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Z-man. I am *really* not good at copyediting at all. Keep after the LoCE — maybe go to the talk page there and try to get to know some people. I do just about everything else, but that's not my strong point. Good luck ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Wii Points

What should be done about this? Clearly they should be removed, but I know if I removed them from the list pages...people would just revert my edits. The discussion at the Video Game Project talk page (which you posted at) doesn't seem to be getting anywhere. Should a request for comment be used? I've done some of those in the past (for other things), with little success though. RobJ1981 22:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I suppose so. I will wait a few days, but I'm pretty sure the situation will be the same then. I'm either going to do a RFC, or just ask some admins to intervine. They know policies much better, so they can determine once and for all if Wii Points (and other download prices: such as Xbox Live Arcade) need to be listed or not. The listings seem to violate a few policies as it stands now, so I would think those should hold up in this case. RobJ1981 23:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I posted on WP:ANI about the price problem, as I'm tired of the arguing at the talk page. Hopefully some admins see it, and resolve this price guide issue. It's clearly violating guidelines, and I'm sure there is sites that list prices (which can be put in external links for the appropriate articles). I don't know of any sites myself, but a search should turn up some I would assume. RobJ1981 21:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Social Christianity

Thanky. :) --WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Copyedit request

Sure, I'll take a look at it as soon as possible. Meanwhile, do you think you could help proofread Michiru Kaioh? I just submitted it as ready for final proofread, and I'm eager to see what I've missed. Whenever you can, though. Thanks! The Hippie 23:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:ADOPT input

Hello, Mr.Z-man. The Adopt-a-User program is looking for new ideas and input on the program. If you are still interested please stop by the talk page and read some of the ideas being floated and give a comment. If you want to update or change your information on the adopter's list page, now would be a great time! Thanks! V60 干什么？ · VDemolitions 03:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Editor not engaging in mediation

What to do in this case, Mr. Z. User:Dking is not engaging in the mediation at Cults_and_new_religious_movements_in_literature_and_popular_culture, despite the fact that he asked for such mediation. The only recourse I have is to revert to the undisputed version and see if that prompts him to engage. I do not want to do that, though. Could you please ask him to participate? ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Mediation of cults in pop culture

Hi. I would be interested in helping mediate, if you think I might be useful. Haven't mediated on wikipedia before, so it would be useful experience for me. I have fair amount of background in the study of religion. The parties disagree on the fairness of applying 'cult' (except where Jossie would agree that term is adequately referenced for each application, or where Dking would agree that the designation is not plausible on definitional grounds). However, this argument over 'cult' is difficult because WP:Cult might benefit from mediation/etc. Until 'cult' has a settled WP:NPOV meaning, I'm not quite sure how we can figure out how to apply it within an en.wp article. On the other hand, I'm wondering if you could ask both parties to focus first on NRM. Perhaps they might agree that it is NPOV to describe Zane Grey, Twain, etc as dealing with NRM's. (Granting that NRM is anachronistic and not cited in the old sources, it is a widely accepted current NPOV term.) Of course, the mediator should stipulate that an agreement on NRM does not waive anyone's unresolved claim to use 'cult' too. Please let me know if you think I might be helpful. HG 03:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Placed my offer on the mediation page and their user talks. Jossi responded and accepted. Dking has not responded. I posed a few questions to Jossi here. Just let me know: (1) How would you like me to communicate with you? Here? (2) Should I communicate with them via their talk pages, or would it be better to do it all on the article talk page, or even the case page? HG 15:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyedit

Hello there Mr.Z-man. I'm The Random Editor. You asked me to read over Mackinac Island. I did, and I believe that it is set & ready to go. Well written, good prose, correct spelling. I fixed the one & only typo. I say, run it again for GA status. --Random Say it here! 19:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

My bad, yes that it was I meant. :) --Random Say it here! 19:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Question

MR Z

I had sent u a message a little while ago about copywright information, your reply was

"If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Satan Disciples with a link to the details. Or, alternatively, you may rewrite the material in a way different from your website. Hope this helps! Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)"

I did what you had suggested but I have not heard back from them. Does this mean that I will be able to create the pages on Wiki using the information that is copywritten on my site now, without having it removed??

Chicagogangs 16:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Chicagogangs

Hey

I'm glad we both see that Ruslan sviridov should be gone =D Whstchy 18:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, a long stretch, highly doubt it won't get deleted Whstchy 18:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Lawrence Dimick

Hi! I've removed the speedy tag on Lawrence Dimick, as I believe it no longer qualifies. (You may have jumped the gun a bit; article authors often take more than a few minutes to get an article in shape.) I expect you'll want to put it to AfD, though. If you do, please let me know. Thanks, William Pietri 05:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Straight blast.

How else do I assert notibility?? Give me a break. You knew what that was about. Because it was AfD'd 207.202.227.125 01:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Refimprove

I just reverted your change to Template:Refimprove then I saw the TfD for Template:Refimprovesect. I am reading it now. Jeepday (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I looked at what happened I feel it could have been handled better, I have started a discussion at Template_talk:Unreferenced#Merge_and_Redirect.2C_after_speedy_close_of_TfD. Jeepday (talk) 02:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

FIBIS Advert tag

I have edited the FIBIS page now so that it hopefully reads less like an advert. Can we remove the tag? 213.208.100.78 15:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Question

Earlier in the month: you posted this on my talk page (about Wii Points): I was thinking an RfC, especially as current discussion seems to be much more evenly divided than some of the previous ones. I would wait a day or 2 first to see how the discussion pans out before considering starting one though. It really is a difficult situation as there is no policy or guideline (that I can think of) that really applies to something like prices. I can't remember if you posted here or not?Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Not_a_sales_catalogue_or_price_guide. In any event: the discussion seems to have died. I also made this (which has some activity, but seems to have died down I believe): Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Video_game_download_prices_.28again.29. This price issue is for several articles, so I'm not sure if I should do a RFC for all (or just the original problem area). Several places have download prices, unsuitable for an encyclopedia. If one RFC happens: the other pages should follow suit, as they are similar... but might not, so I wasn't sure. If you need a list of the articles, I can post them. There is several regular articles, as well as list pages that have this price nonsense. RobJ1981 15:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I've created a new discussion here: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Download_prices_in_video_game_articles. If that fails, I guess RFC is my only other option. Feel free to comment if you have time. RobJ1981 22:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:SCV

Thanks for helping out over at WP:SCV, especially the Commons item. --Butseriouslyfolks 02:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

My understanding is that we can use media licensed under certain of the CC licenses but that we cannot use CC licensed text, although I'm having a difficult time reconciling those positions. Try User_talk:Ram-Man/MLFAQ and Wikipedia:Multi-licensing for more information. --Butseriouslyfolks 03:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: ^demonBot2

Y Done ^demon[omg plz] 10:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Mediation

See Talk:Cults_and_new_religious_movements_in_literature_and_popular_culture#Mediation_.28cont.29 ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Jonathan Babineaux

What gives with reversing my edit on libel grounds? I deal with insurance and legal issues on a professional basis and there's no reason to remove my edit regarding his arrest when it's well documented. I've seen this edit added and removed by other users, but there's no reason for the removal! I cross-checked my information but forgot to add sources, however the next guy still added souces and did it properly, but IT STILL GOT REVERSED! Did his lawyers come after us?!? An arrest for animal decapitation is legitimate news and if proved true will potentially result in banishment from the NFL. Why does this keep getting deleted???AndyinMN 23:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

You are indeed a great man.--Rastabilly 04:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Adminship

Congratulations, you are now an administrator! If you haven't already, now is the time look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Thanks for the nudge, Warofdreams talk 03:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats. I am sure you will be familiar with the text there, but it is surely a good reminder: Wikipedia:Advice for new administrators ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats on your adminship! -Cquan (after the beep...BEEP.) 22:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Dear Z-man

Z-man, wait, don't protect any of those articles: email on the way! Love, Phaedriel - 03:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Wait, I got a question. Why does Phaedriel want to unprotect the page? That article has been consistenly abuse by socks of a banned editor.--PrestonH(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!) 04:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats on becomeing an admin. I know you will do good for Wikipedia!

Politics rule 11:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA ...

Hi. Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was successful and I am now an admin. I also want to congratulate you on your recent RfA and commend you on your handling of the opposing comments there; to be honest, I think your comment at Talk:Phi Kappa Psi was grossly misinterpreted. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 05:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of AVForums article

Hello, I was wondering how AVForums.com can be considered insignificant? It's Europe's busiest hoome cinema discussion forum, it has over 4 million posts, and a membership of over 170,000 people. It's the biggest home cinema website in the UK.

Stuart David Wright 06:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Spinball

The article made no mention of membership or number of posts. It asserted no notability whatsoever. It basically said it was a UK based home consumer electronics forum. Per WP:CSD, articles that make no assertion of notability may be deleted. If it really is notable, feel free to rewrite it. Try adding some links to more external sources like newspapers or reputable webzines. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion frenzy

Just because you have been given the power to delete articles does not give you the right to decide what should and should not be on Wikipedia. I see I have already been beaten to your Talk page by someone else querying a deletion you have made. In this case I am talking about the Ideal World article. It has already been recreated by someone.

I do not know what the article looked like when you deleted it, but if it appeared to be blatant advertising, then you should have reviewed the article history, to see when the offending text may have been added. If it was not clearly defined, then a tag should be placed to request a clean up of the article. If after that you still felt it was not suitable for Wikipedia, then you put it through the established deletion procedure, as anyone else would. I have a feeling that the article was not in bad condition at the time of your deletion, and the true reason for its deletion was you testing out your new powers.

This is not a good start to your adminship. --Daniel Lawrence 22:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Are you familiar with WP:CSD, Daniel? See CSD G11. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
It was pretty bad. Create and Craft is the craft makers’ dream channel. The only channel fully dedicated to crafting. Devoted to a wide range of craft pursuits and hobbies including all the essentials and specialist materials needed for card making, drawing, painting, needlecraft, embroidery, rubber stamping, scrap-booking, decoupage, rainbow glass, pinflair and encaustic art. That is standard speedy deletable spam. It read like it was written by their advertising department. The current version is much better and it actually has sources too. I didn't even nominate it for speedy deletion, another user did. If you really want me to undelete it (which would require deletion of the better, current version) to take it to AfD, I will, but I can imagine the outcome will be the same, I doubt it will even last a day on AfD. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The article was not always in that state. As I said in my first message, "you should have reviewed the article history, to see when the offending text may have been added". It seems crazy that a good article that gets defaced by one person will be deleted, removing all the hard work of possibly many years by many people. All because of one person making a bad edit, and the administrator who neglected to review the article history. --Daniel Lawrence 18:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I did look at the history. I could have reverted to a version from about 7 months ago, but that was in horrible shape, did not cite any sources and could have been deleted per WP:CSD#A7, as all it said was that it was a UK shopping channel. It then went on to list presenters (mostly redlinks) and list a bunch of poorly written trivial facts that made no sense as there was no context to establish what they were referring to. Or I could have reverted to a stub, that also failed CSD A7 that was the same as the later version but without all the redlinks and random facts. Also, " I have a feeling that the article was not in bad condition at the time of your deletion, and the true reason for its deletion was you testing out your new powers." - Please assume good faith and not automatically jump to admin abuse!. Just because I am a new admin does not mean I am a total idiot when it come to speedy deletion. Again, if you want me to undelete it to take it to AfD, I will. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 18:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)