Talk:Mr. Munchausen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
[edit] Vfd
On 25 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mr. Munchausen: Being a True Account of Some of the Recent Adventures Beyond the Styx of the Late Hieronymus Carl Friedrich, Sometime Baron Munchausen of Bodenwerder for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 02:01, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Mr.
Is the argument being made that a person may be originally a "Mr" and then created baron, or originally a "Mr" and inherit the title or Baron as thus "move up," or be a baron and then stripped of the title and "move down" to "Mr"? I'd agree with that possibility. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly. The countradiction would be in the expression "Mr. Baron M". This rather silly bickering here is a problem of OR in the nutshell. Any judgements must be attributed. `'Míkka 17:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- I fail to see how OR is a question here. The above is exactly my point. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- OR was your addition to the article: you drew conclusions by yourself, rather than took them from a source. Sometimes it works, sometimes don't. `'Míkka 19:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- What conclusions? --Daniel C. Boyer 17:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- OR was your addition to the article: you drew conclusions by yourself, rather than took them from a source. Sometimes it works, sometimes don't. `'Míkka 19:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I fail to see how OR is a question here. The above is exactly my point. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
