Talk:Motorola 68000 family
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Separate 68K article needed
There should be a separate article on the 68k architecture apart from the 68000 chip. It would mirror the way that x86 does not redirect to 8086, and is informative on the family. 132.205.15.5
- Good point. And this article is the one, it seems (I take it the above comment was written before this article was established). --Wernher 04:51, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Anyone know of a good 68k simulator for Linux/Gnome? Something like easy68k preferably ;)
Please email me if you do...zephyrxero[at]gmaildotcom --Zephyrxero 20:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed move
I'm not the original proposer, but I'd support such a move. JulesH 09:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Removed the move template since it is no longer listed on WP:RM. If move is still requested relist on WP:RM. Vegaswikian 06:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] who makes 68k chips?
Who makes 68k chips? Now that, you know, Motorola doesn't make chips any more. --68.0.120.35 00:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Freescale makes 68k/DragonBall/ColdFire[1] chips (although they're phasing out the 68k-based DragonBalls in favor of ARM-based DragonBalls, it appears). Guy Harris 01:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Modern" Desktop Computers
I have a problem with this statement: "Although no modern desktop computers are based on the 68k," well, couldn't the Amiga be considered modern? Its last manafacture date is 1994/95 but the computers are still in use today (see the amount of Amiga sites still on the internet -- I can't external link obviously) so doesn't that make it a "modern" machine? How do we define "modern"?