Talk:Motorola 68000 family

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, which is licensed under the GFDL.
This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale
This article is part of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project!
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Separate 68K article needed

There should be a separate article on the 68k architecture apart from the 68000 chip. It would mirror the way that x86 does not redirect to 8086, and is informative on the family. 132.205.15.5

Good point. And this article is the one, it seems (I take it the above comment was written before this article was established). --Wernher 04:51, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Anyone know of a good 68k simulator for Linux/Gnome? Something like easy68k preferably ;)

Please email me if you do...zephyrxero[at]gmaildotcom --Zephyrxero 20:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed move

I'm not the original proposer, but I'd support such a move. JulesH 09:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Removed the move template since it is no longer listed on WP:RM. If move is still requested relist on WP:RM. Vegaswikian 06:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] who makes 68k chips?

Who makes 68k chips? Now that, you know, Motorola doesn't make chips any more. --68.0.120.35 00:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Freescale makes 68k/DragonBall/ColdFire[1] chips (although they're phasing out the 68k-based DragonBalls in favor of ARM-based DragonBalls, it appears). Guy Harris 01:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] "Modern" Desktop Computers

I have a problem with this statement: "Although no modern desktop computers are based on the 68k," well, couldn't the Amiga be considered modern? Its last manafacture date is 1994/95 but the computers are still in use today (see the amount of Amiga sites still on the internet -- I can't external link obviously) so doesn't that make it a "modern" machine? How do we define "modern"?