Talk:Mosaic Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this page has been modeled after several other non-profit subjects. What exactly is this site advertising?

I agree. This article covers a multi-decade history of a non-profit organization in Los Angeles.

[edit] rescued for the moment

Don't mind the wording of the messages. They're standard forms. But it will surely be nominated for deletion once again, unless you provide third-party sources, printed or web, but not from a blog. Has there been any newspaper or TV or religious magazine coverage? This is now the most important factor for new articles here. If you can show that, all religious denominations are considered encyclopedia worthy, & the article can & will be defended. I regret I've not the time to help more personally.DGG 07:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] this article needs a complete rewrite

it is very poorly written, poorly sourced, and linking to blogs of original research is inappropriate--71.156.166.51 08:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The link to "apostolic" leads to a disambiguation page with many possible articles on apostolic. This is unhelpful. It should go to the appropriate article depending on the meaning of "apostolic" within the context of Mosaic Church. I would fix it but I don't know which article on "apostolic" would be the right choice in this context. - Mark Dixon (talk) 06:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] deleted external links in violation of wiki policy

deleted two external links that linked to blogs that are not written by a recognized authority

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_links

Links normally to be avoided

Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority--71.156.166.51 08:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)