Talk:Morton Berger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morton Berger article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This page is biased in favore of pedophiles, someone that digs into this kinda stuff really needs to look deeper into this, they say he was convicted for 20 images collected over 6 years? that doesnt sound true. i got this info from another page: "Morton Berger was earlier awarded a 200 year sentence by the Arizona court because he possessed 1000s of porn images of children in his computer. The court awarded 10 years for each of 20 images he possessed for a total of 200 years punishment. This sentence will be served continuously for a total of 200 years without the possibility of a parole. The Prosecutor originally asked for 340 years." from http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/127985/US_200_year_Porn_Sentence_Stands_in_Supreme_Court i think theyre trying to make this guy look like some victim of injustice. regardless of how hars or lax his sentence might be, the info is wrong. Edited 09:58, 27 March 2007 by user 24.255.236.55

I have amended it to state that these were specimen charges representing a larger collection. Richard75 15:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

The only noteworthy aspect of this case is that the sentencing was particularly harsh. I don't believe the article to be biased. That the sentence delivered to Morton Berger was too extreme is whole point of its public interest.209.29.84.21 04:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)