Talk:Morea expedition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Morea expedition has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on June 22, 2007.
Morea expedition is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece.
If you would like to participate, you can improve Morea expedition, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (comments)
Mid This article has been rated as a Mid priority article
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Good work

This is a very well sourced article that was missing from the Greek War of Independence series. I made a few mainly aesthetic changes and wikilinked a couple of stuff I knew. Good work. NikoSilver 22:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


Is land intervention a newspeak word for invasion or military excursion?

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of June 25, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: yes, prose is excellent
2. Factually accurate?: well-sourced
3. Broad in coverage?: complete in all respects
4. Neutral point of view?: no issues of POV
5. Article stability? very stable
6. Images?: all are free or appropriately tagged

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — Argos'Dad 20:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Conflicts, battles and military exercises" articles. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed. I have made minor corrections and have included several points below that need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. Please address them within seven days and the article will maintain its GA status. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted. If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Here are the points that need to be addressed:

  1. Single sentences shouldn't stand alone, so statements like "As the gathering process went along, they sent the plants, as well as birds and fish, to France.[46]" either needs to be expanded on or incorporated into another paragraph.

Add inline citations for:

  1. "Through this work, he became the first to divide ancient art by periods, classifying works chronologically and stylistically."
  2. "Greece became the “motherland of the arts” and “the teacher of taste”."
  3. "Later, Capodistria charged Virlet d’Aoust with studying the possibility of cutting a canal across the Isthmus of Corinth."

Overall, the article was an interesting read and well-sourced. The above issues shouldn't take very long to address and should be easy to fix. Good job on getting so many free images to include in the article. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 01:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GAR: Kept

Since the above issues were not addressed, I went through and put the inline citations into hidden comments. If sources are found, they can be removed from the hidden comments. At this time, I believe the article should keep its GA status since it meets the requirements of the GA criteria. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have update the article history to reflect this review. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 06:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)