Talk:More Irish than the Irish themselves

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ireland Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the priority scale.

[edit] Modern usage

User:Sony-youth has removed the discussion of modern usage. I think it's relevant, has been a part of the article for a while now, and a number of editors have contributed to that section. I think modern usage is very relevant. I'm putting it back in. --Kathryn NicDhàna 21:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Kathryn. Can you cite a source to show that this "modern usage" is in common practice? The rest of the paragraph in question is also speculative (from "One of the reasons .." onwards) and is similarly unsupported. I'm suggesting that the section should be removed until such point as the claim that this is the "modern usage" of the term is substantiated. Sony-youth 11:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
This is a tricky one. I hear and read it rather frequently in conversations, in person and online, but really can't recall if it's been published anywhere that meets Wiki standards. Let me think on it and I'll see if I can turn up anything suitable. Someone else wrote the "emulation of American culture" bit. I added the part about differences between the cultures, as that's the reason I've always seen given. Even if we wind up being unable to fully source all of the modern usage section to Wiki standards, I do think it's important to leave in *something* about the contemporary usage, especially in relation to cultural appropriation. --Kathryn NicDhàna 22:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I can see where you're coming from but don't think what the section describes is a modern usage - meaning that the "original usage" is archaic. The phrase is definitely still in use (and, I wholeheartedly agree that the article needs a section that says so), but rather than a new/modern usage, I think its the same phrase applied to ever more groups of people (not exclusively Irish-Americans) just as the phrase was used in the past.
I'll try to dig some stuff up too. Meet you back here for a rewrite? Sony-youth 21:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Cool. As long as there's some addressing of the concerns I cited above, I'm fine with a rewrite. --Kathryn NicDhàna 22:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed rewrite of final section

Original version:

The phrase is also used in a mildly derogatory sense by the Irish living in Ireland to describe Irish-Americans or residents of other nations who have some degree of Irish heritage, who exhibit their Irish nationalism, especially on visits to the "old country". Such people are also sometimes known as "Plastic Paddies" by residents of Ireland. One of the reasons given for this is the belief that, even if these visitors are of exclusively Irish lineage, their claims are pointless because, if anything, Ireland, like the United Kingdom and most English-speaking nations, has emulated US culture and behaviour for decades. Another reason given is that Irish culture does have significant differences from Irish-American culture, and that knowing one culture doesn't mean someone knows, or is a part of, both cultures. Some feel that it is cultural appropriation for those who are not part of Irish culture to claim they are "Irish".

Proposed rewrite:

The phrase is still commonly used, both colloquially and in the media, in reference to immigration and assimilation in Ireland (see for example in The Irish Times[1], Sen. Jim Walsh [2], Dr. Liam Twomey TD[3] or Irish Emigrant[4]) or in conversation discussing the relationship between the cultural heritage of the Irish diaspora and the Irish in Ireland (for example [5]). While still echoing its original meaning, contemporary usage of the phrase usually takes a more open interpretation of assimilation or, in the case of the diaspora, the maintenance of Irish heritage. Debates of the Oireachtas demonstrate the age and range of contemporary applications of the phrase[6]. Either when discussing the diaspora:

"I do not think this country will afford sufficient allurements to the citizens of other States ... The children of Irish parents born abroad are sometimes more Irish than the Irish themselves, and they would come with added experience and knowledge to our country ..." Sen. Patrick Kenny, 1924[7]

Or, more light-heartedly, on assimilation:

"... [As] in olden times the attractiveness of Irish life made the Norman invaders ... "Hiberniores Hibernicis ipsis," "more Irish than the Irish themselves," so the charms of Galway, experienced through 25 happy years, have made a woman, born in one of the severed counties, feel entitled to describe herself as "Galviensior Galviensibus ipsis"-"more Galwegian than the Galwegians themselves"" Helena Concannon TD, 1937[8]

--sony-youth 00:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I think it's a good rewrite, though I would also propose at least a brief mention that the phrase is sometimes used in a more negative sense, concerning cultural appropriation. Perhaps something like:
"Occasionally the phrase is also used in a pejorative sense, for those of the diaspora who mistakenly believe they know more about Irish culture than do the Irish themselves, or who display pride in their Irish heritage in what some see as an ostentatious or tasteless manner (See also Plastic Paddy)."
I know I've seen message-board posts that use it in this manner, but as it's been a few years I have no idea if I can find them.
--Kathryn NicDhàna 21:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I've taken a few days to think this over and I still think that emphasizing the use of the phrase in a pejorative context is a misrepresentation. Of course all phrases can be used sarcastically, but that is quiet different to saying the phrase itself should be understood as pejorative - or even having a interpretation that should naturally be understood to be pejorative.
In your suggestion, I especially cannot agree with the description of people "who mistakenly believe they know more about Irish culture than do the Irish themselves" as it is sounds extremely POV and "in what some see" seems to be weasel words.
I did a Google search for "more irish than the irish themselves" and "Irish-American." These are the most pejorative results:
Is this what you mean? Honestly, at worst, these sound like sarcasm and cannot be justification to say that the phrase is pejorative.
--sony-youth 18:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I understand your stance on this. I do agree that "sarcastic use" is more accurate than "pejorative". What about some indication that it is sometimes used sarcastically? I'm sorry I can't be of more help with sourcing this, as I admit most of the use I've seen of it in a sarcastic manner has not been in sources that meet an encyclopedic standard (mostly from conversations with friends in person and folks online). I am awaiting the arrival of some slang dictionaries I hope might help. But perhaps the usage of it as sarcasm is too fringe and/or new to merit mention. --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 23:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Sony, I've incorporated the above changes. How about doing more sourcing on the earlier bits, too? --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 03:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Quote, The phrase is still commonly used however, both colloquially and in the media Unquote. Is the phrase still commonly used? Maybe it is used by the media, but it's not in the common language. Any Irish Editors out there? 86.42.132.84 21:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


I'm an Irish editor. Yeah, its a fairly common phrase - no really fixed meaning though, but as a reference to the original medieval usage (I'd argue). Certainly it would be commonly understood and not sound out of place in a conversation.
Also, Kathryn. Thanks for the edit. Sorry, I didn't get a chance to reply until now. --sony-youth 10:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] See also

This article could use some internal links. Bearian 13:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I quite agree. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)